Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Frank Peters schrieb:
Correct. But again - this situation is caused by the way, the wiki
started. As it started without licensing resctrictions, only the
Copyright is relevant.
The wiki copyright page states
"Copyright 1999-2007 by the contributing authors and Sun
Hi,
Frank Peters schrieb:
Correct. But again - this situation is caused by the way, the wiki
started. As it started without licensing resctrictions, only the
Copyright is relevant.
The wiki copyright page states
"Copyright 1999-2007 by the contributing authors and Sun Microsystems,
Inc."
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
Creating new documentation content
If we create new documentation content on the wiki, it must be
created using the PDL to be compatible with doc.oo.o
If the documentation *stays on* the wiki and is not moved to doc.oo.o,
then it should not need to
Frank Peters wrote:
Creating new documentation content
If we create new documentation content on the wiki, it must be
created using the PDL to be compatible with doc.oo.o
If the documentation *stays on* the wiki and is not moved to
doc.oo.o, then it should not need to be created using the PDL.
Hi André,
[...]
So that means that all pages on the wiki that currently
don't have an explicit license note carry no license at all
and that anyone who wants to reuse the content in any form
needs to contact the copyright holder for approval?
Correct. But again - this situation is caused by t
Hi Frank,
Frank Peters schrieb:
Andre Schnabel wrote:
Interesting discussion, and necessary, too. We need to look
at how we can make the wiki usable for documentation purposes
either by changing the licensing of the wiki or the docs.
I see no reason to change the licensing at the wiki, as t
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Andre Schnabel wrote,
No -this does not answer any question. The wiki has been
established without any licensing restrictions.
Frank Peters wrote:
We need to look at how we can make the wiki usable for
documentation purposes
Is there any reason why the wiki cann
Andre Schnabel wrote:
Interesting discussion, and necessary, too. We need to look
at how we can make the wiki usable for documentation purposes
either by changing the licensing of the wiki or the docs.
I see no reason to change the licensing at the wiki, as there is no
explicit license.
So
