Frank Peters írta:
OOoAuthors wrote:
Hi Frank @all,
if there will be a way to export the wiki content with styles to odf and
the result is in the same quality like the current documents it will be
the best way, cause in this
case any person could contribute without problem like wrong style e
On 7/31/07, Frank Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would also be a good advertisment including ODF and OOo in a larger
> authoring environment showing the beauty and potential of working
> with ODF-XML in a automated, scripted fashion.
>
> You really should take a close look at Daisy. Docum
Excellent discussion in the last 2 emails! Beautiful!
We may have to experiment some to come up with the best overall
solution. Also we will want to consider such aspects as which projects
are under the most active development and have the greatest potential
for long-term growth. The most a
Wow!
And, for what very little it's worth, I agree with the goals and most of the
methods of meeting them. The only reason I didn't support this suggestion more
strongly earlier is that I seem to recall that similar suggestions had been
investigated by the "responsible parties" and rejected.
On 7/31/07, Frank Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If we want to move to the wiki as the main collaborative
> platform we need mediawiki->ODF and mediawiki->PDF conversion
> processes.
I can't say the required extension to Mediawiki doesn't exist, but I went
through all of the Media Wiki ext
OOoAuthors wrote:
> Hi Frank @all,
>
> if there will be a way to export the wiki content with styles to odf and
> the result is in the same quality like the current documents it will be
> the best way, cause in this
> case any person could contribute without problem like wrong style etc.
>
> Perh
Hi Mike,
Check these out
Best bet
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/wiki2xml/
But, under export pages in this link.
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFEXT/UWC+Mediawiki+Notes
Then there is a section called HTML Tidy in this page???
http://swik.net/HTML+convert
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Earlier, Frank asked whether the source for the OOoAuthors books would
> be the wiki in future. This was in the context of perhaps combining
> those books with the "official" User Guide on the wiki.
>
> I asked on the OOoAuthors list for people's preferences on keeping t
Earlier, Frank asked whether the source for the OOoAuthors books
would be the wiki in future. This was in the context of perhaps
combining those books with the "official" User Guide on the wiki.
I asked on the OOoAuthors list for people's preferences on
keeping the source as ODT or wiki. So fa
Frank Peters wrote:
Inside Sun we're using a direct system (SGML->PDF) that
works really well. I would like to give it a chance to
see what we can come up with.
I'd be delighted if it works.
To be honest, many of the PDFs created "by hand" are nor
very compelling either.
I agree. If people
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Frank Peters wrote:
>> Frank Peters wrote:
>>> Issues:
>>>
>>> - Mediawiki does not support image export (or does it?)
>>> - The process should be controlled by a script that
>>> accesses the wiki, fetches the pages, converts them
>>> and creates PDF (did anyone say "
Frank Peters wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
Issues:
- Mediawiki does not support image export (or does it?)
- The process should be controlled by a script that
accesses the wiki, fetches the pages, converts them
and creates PDF (did anyone say "Perl"? ;-)
Anything else?
We'd need a solid tem
On 7/31/07, Jean Hollis Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, marbux! That extension sounds like a good possibility, if
> is easy for me to use and gives acceptable output. If we have the
> wiki as source, my main need will be to convert from wiki to ODT.
I think you can test it online at
Frank Peters wrote:
> Issues:
>
> - Mediawiki does not support image export (or does it?)
> - The process should be controlled by a script that
> accesses the wiki, fetches the pages, converts them
> and creates PDF (did anyone say "Perl"? ;-)
>
> Anything else?
We'd need a solid template fo
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Thanks, marbux! That extension sounds like a good possibility, if is
> easy for me to use and gives acceptable output. If we have the wiki as
> source, my main need will be to convert from wiki to ODT.
If we want to move to the wiki as the main collaborative
platform we
Thanks, marbux! That extension sounds like a good possibility, if
is easy for me to use and gives acceptable output. If we have the
wiki as source, my main need will be to convert from wiki to ODT.
--Jean
marbux wrote:
I haven't tried it, but there is a Mediawiki extension for the purpose.
<
16 matches
Mail list logo
