Schema 3 +1
I prefer schema 3 of the coding design.
I think it's better to provide a generic design.
Best Regards
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Gang Li 李岗
lgcar...@apache.org
From: leon bao
Date: 2020-12-07 23:56
To: dev
Subject: [DISCUSS]Code solution for project/workflow/task
##1. Back
Schema 3 +1， I prefer "none of business and generated by the system"
Best Regards
---
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Lidong Dai 代立冬
dailidon...@gmail.com
---
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:01 AM Hemin Wen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> You can see the solution for splitting json:
>
Hi!
You can see the solution for splitting json:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r84ed046de63899476f067dd207496428812a8687045bb4485072ee2d%40%3Cdev.dolphinscheduler.apache.org%3E
Because the coding scheme needs to be introduced in the splitting json
scheme,
So, These two can advance together
I think this work should better setup after splitting workflow json.
Non of the solution is not the perfect one
From: boyi
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 20:24
To: dev@dolphinscheduler.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]Code solution for project/workflow/task
hi:
scheme 2
+1
scheme 1
+1
The use of a name cannot intuitively express the meaning of its own indication,
and the explanation cost is too high.
Best wishes！
CalvinKirs
On 12/8/2020 20:23，boyi wrote：
hi:
scheme 2
+1
--
BoYi ZhangE-mail : zhangboyi...@163.com
On 12/8/2
hi:
scheme 2
+1
--
BoYi ZhangE-mail : zhangboyi...@163.com
On 12/8/2020 16:35，Hemin Wen wrote：
scheme 2
+1
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) Commtter
Hemin Wen 温合民
wenhe...@apache.org
leon bao 于2020年12月8日周二 上午12:14写道：
scheme 2
+1
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) Commtter
Hemin Wen 温合民
wenhe...@apache.org
leon bao 于2020年12月8日周二 上午12:14写道：
> For the above coding solutions, you can approve of the scheme with + 1.
> If you think that the scheme is not good, please feel fre
