[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: avoid infinite loop when concatenating adjacent segments

2015-12-19 Thread David Verbeiren
This patch aligns the logic used to check for the presence of adjacent segments in has_adjacent_segments() with the logic used in cleanup_segments() when actually deciding to concatenate or not a pair of segments. This fixes an infinite loop that happened when segments where adjacent in their phys

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread O'Driscoll, Tim
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 8:14 PM > To: Wiles, Keith > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling > > 2015-12-19 16:21, Wiles, Keith: > > On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-19 16:21, Wiles, Keith: > On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: > >2015-12-19 02:16, Wiles, Keith: > >> On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: > >> >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: > >> >> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases. > >> >> D

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-19 02:16, Wiles, Keith: >> On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" > dpdk.org on behalf of thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: >> >> >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: >> >> We need to define the deadlines for the next re

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-19 02:16, Wiles, Keith: > On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" dpdk.org on behalf of thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: > > >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: > >> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases. > >> During 2015, we were doing a release every

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: >> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases. >> During 2015, we were doing a release every 4 months. >> If we keep the same pace, the next releases would be: >> 2.3: end of March

[dpdk-dev] Issue with patch "app/testpmd: detect numa socket count"

2015-12-19 Thread Qiu, Michael
Sorry, I forgot to do that, add CC to mailing list Thanks, Michael > ? 2015?12?197:32?Stephen Hurd ??? > > Thanks, I can reproduce it now. > > The intent was to set max_socket when detecting lcores, not when selecting > active ones, so there's a bug in my patch. I'll actually be working

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: > We need to define the deadlines for the next releases. > During 2015, we were doing a release every 4 months. > If we keep the same pace, the next releases would be: > 2.3: end of March > 2.4: end of July > 2.5: end of November > > However, th