[dpdk-dev] bnx2x assertion failure sc->bar[0]

Hi, We are seeing assertion failure in bnx2x with DPDK example code. [root at VM ~]# ./symmetric_mp fakeelf -c 2 -m2048 -n2 --proc-type=secondary -- -p 3 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 [.] [.] EAL: PCI device :0b:00.0 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 14e4:168e rte_bnx2x_pmd EAL: PCI me

[dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-01-22 16:56, Ferruh Yigit: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:31:45PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > > > Not commenting the implementation, just the method. > > > > > > 2016-01-22 16:00, Ferruh Yigit: > >

[dpdk-dev] DPDK mbuf pool in SR-IOV env and one RX/TX queue

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:35:20PM -0800, Saurabh Mishra wrote: > Hi, > > > Is it possible for two or more processes to share the same mbuf_pool in > SR-IOV with single rx/tx queue? > > The sharing of the mbuf pool is not an issue, but sharing of rx/tx queues is. The ethdev queues are not multi-

[dpdk-dev] [PKTGEN] fixing weird termio issues that complicate debugging

On 1/22/16, 1:45 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote: >On 01/21/2016 05:03 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> On 1/21/16, 2:46 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote: >> >>> On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" >>> dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events, registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc. Ste