[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] port: add kni interface support

1. add KNI port type to the packet framework 2. add KNI support to the IP Pipeline sample Application Signed-off-by: WeiJie Zhuang --- v2: * Fix check patch error. --- doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 + examples/ip_pipeline/Makefile | 6 +- examples/ip_pipeline/app.h |

[dpdk-dev] Creation of mbuf pool for socket 0 failed on VM

Hi, On 05/28/2016 09:39 AM, Murali Krishna wrote: > Hi, > > I have attached two 10G NICs to VM as pass-through devices and I?m trying > to run testpmd on the VM. I have assigned 4GB RAM and 2 cores to the VM. > > /DPDK22/testpmd -c 0x3 -n 2 -d /DPDK22/librte_pmd_oce.so -w $P0 -w $P1 -- > -i --nb

[dpdk-dev] Creation of mbuf pool for socket 0 failed on VM

Hi, I have attached two 10G NICs to VM as pass-through devices and I?m trying to run testpmd on the VM. I have assigned 4GB RAM and 2 cores to the VM. /DPDK22/testpmd -c 0x3 -n 2 -d /DPDK22/librte_pmd_oce.so -w $P0 -w $P1 -- -i --nb-cores=1 --nb-ports=2 Where P0 and P1 are the PCI IDs of t

[dpdk-dev] KNI: Need for KNI-Ethtool support

Hello, Could you please let me know what is the use case for having ethtool support over KNI interfaces? Is it expected to be implemented by poll mode drivers? PMD APIs pretty much covers all the configuration/status retrieval needed from the nic, so not sure what is the the benefit of providing of