Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Linzhe Lee
> Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 3:05 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix atomic refcnt update synchronization
>
> yes,stephen.
>
> m
On 9/2/2016 8:14 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 08/27/2016 06:26 PM, Pankaj Chauhan wrote:
>> Add command line options for selecting switch implementation
>> and maximum ports for the vswitch.following are two new command
>> line options:
>>
>> --switch [char string, Selects the switch imleme
On 9/2/2016 7:47 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> Sorry for the late review.
Hi Maxime,
No problem :) Thanks for the review, and it came just in time. I am
almost done with testing the patchset for intel (with vmdq) and i was
about to send the next version tomorrow.
Now that i'v
Hello,
I want to write my own PMD for testing and debugging purposes. I
compiled it as shared library and I was going to load it using "-d"
option. Unfortunately, it didn't work.
I walked through DPDK source code I found out that "-d" options does
hardly anything (please correct me if I am wrong
it seems that set fdir port conf cause the problem,just add fdir conf
in the port_conf, don't add any fdir rules.
set port conf like this in the l2fwd code.
static const struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
.rxmode = {
.split_hdr_size = 0,
.header_split = 0,
yes,stephen.
my config file here: http://pastebin.com/N0RKGArh
2016-09-03 0:51 GMT+08:00 Stephen Hemminger :
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:31:50 +0800
> Linzhe Lee wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reply, Stephen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
>>
>>
>>
>> When
Thanks for reply, Stephen.
I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
When allocation mbuf in program1, and transfer it to program2 for free
via ring, the program1 might meet assert in allocate mbuf sometimes.
(`RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 0);`)
but whe
7 matches
Mail list logo
