[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] doc/failsafe: fix incorrect statement regarding number of sub-device

2020-02-21 Thread Gaetan Rivet
Supporting more than 2 sub-device is a remnant from earlier fail-safe design, that was never actually published. Fixes: a46f8d584eb8 ("net/failsafe: add fail-safe PMD") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet --- doc/guides/nics/fail_safe.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 de

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] failsafe: improve documentation

2020-02-21 Thread Gaetan Rivet
The fail-safe documentation is subpar. It can be improved (1), and an error is present from the beginning (2). Gaetan Rivet (2): doc/failsafe: improve fail-safe documentation doc/failsafe: fix incorrect statement regarding number of sub-device doc/guides/nics/fail_safe.rst | 109

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] doc/failsafe: improve fail-safe documentation

2020-02-21 Thread Gaetan Rivet
Reading the fail-safe doc with a few years added, a few phrasing choices are ambiguous or confusing. Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet --- doc/guides/nics/fail_safe.rst | 107 +- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/fail_safe.r

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost_blk: use common macros for min/max

2020-02-21 Thread Tiwei Bie
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 07:29:13PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 20/02/2020 03:52, Tiwei Bie: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:39:22AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > The macros RTE_MIN and RTE_MAX can be used in DPDK applications. > > Only RTE_MIN is used in this patch. The title is wrong as

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add note on build issues with gcc < 5.0

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/02/2020 09:30, Mcnamara, John: > > From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo > > > > The following crypto PMDs use the Intel Multi-buffer library: > > - AESNI MB PMD > > - AESNI GCM PMD > > - ZUC PMD > > - KASUMI PMD > > - SNOW3G PMD > > > > When this library is built with gcc < 5.0, it might throw some co

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Tiwei Bie
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:19:31PM +0800, Wang, Zhihong wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Bie, Tiwei > > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:29 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong > > ; tho...@monjalon.net > > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: resign f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] doc: introduce openwrt how-to guide

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/02/2020 03:47, Xiaolong Ye: > This doc describes how to enable DPDK on Openwrt in both virtual and > physical x86 environment. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye > Acked-by: John McNamara Applied, thanks I hope we'll be able to drop this how-to soon, in favor of a DPDK package well integrated i

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost_blk: use common macros for min/max

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/02/2020 03:52, Tiwei Bie: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:39:22AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The macros RTE_MIN and RTE_MAX can be used in DPDK applications. Only RTE_MIN is used in this patch. The title is wrong as well. > > This change implies fixing the sign of used_len as size_t > > a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/mlx5: clarify memory write combining attribute

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/02/2020 13:44, Viacheslav Ovsiienko: > Just add the words about write combining attribute. > > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko Applied, thanks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: rework vm power manager user guide

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/02/2020 11:48, David Hunt: > Review and re-work of vm_power_manager documentation. Hopefully this > is clearer, easier to follow. > > Signed-off-by: David Hunt > > --- > changes in v2 > * Fixed typos. Typos not found even with checkpatch from kernel 5.5.4, but > when the codespell package i

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/2] doc/rcu: correct quiescent state description

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
19/02/2020 22:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > The quiescent state description refers to an incorrect > thread. > > Fixes: 64994b56cfd7 ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Prateek Agarwal > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli Series applied, t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc: fix octeontx2 eventdev devargs

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 11:13, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:25 PM wrote: > > > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > > > Fix OCTEON TX2 event device devargs examples. > > > > Fixes: 55e778ca4648 ("event/octeontx2: add devargs for inflight buffer > > count") > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: P

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: alias to experimental tag for stable apis

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/18/2020 10:46 AM, Ray Kinsella wrote: > When a maintainer is promoting an API to become part of the next major ABI > version by removing the experimental tag, possibly a few releases in > advance of the declaration of the next ABI version. The maintainer may > choose to offer an alias to the e

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] kernel: remove unused directory for Windows

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/02/2020 23:10, Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile: > On 2/17/2020 8:58 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The netuio driver will be hosted in a separate repository: > > > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-kmods%2F&data=02%7C01%7CNarcisa.Vasile%40micros

Re: [dpdk-dev] ABI version of experimental libraries

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
19/02/2020 14:50, Ray Kinsella: > On 19/02/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman: > >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread dave
I can share a data-point with respect to constructing a reasonably functional network stack. Original work on the project which eventually became fd.io vpp started in 2002. I've worked on the vpp code base full-time for 18 years. In terms of lines of code: the vpp graph subsystem is a minuscule

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE

2020-02-21 Thread Song, Keesang
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Thanks Thomas for bringing this up. I consider this is not a new feature, but rather a fix to address the issue with statically assigned maximum lcore limit on high-density CPU platform such as AMD Epyc. As I see a lot of DPDK adopters are sti

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: fix experimental library versioning

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:55 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > The problem occurred when workaround that makes soname two digits > applied. With this change for the ABI version "20.0.1" the experimental > library version become ".so.2001". > After workaround removed in ABI version 21.0, the experimental

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:30 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 21/02/2020 17:13, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > > > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > > > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > > > with '

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE

2020-02-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:48:58 -0500 Aaron Conole wrote: > David Marchand writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote: > > > >> > >> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] > > > > Please, get this header removed. > > This is a public mailing list. > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/windows: fix out-of-memory check

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/02/2020 22:52, Ranjit Menon: > On 2/17/2020 3:56 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > > Check vsnprintf() result to prevent calling malloc() with negative size. > > Check actual malloc() result and terminate asprintf() with documented > > error code to prevent the use of NULL pointer. > > > > Fixes: e842

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 17:13, Ferruh Yigit: > On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > > with '0.'. > > I am not familiar with the script and how libabigail works

[dpdk-dev] [Bug 405] mlx5: the guest driver doesn't enforce the MTU set by rte_eth_dev_set_mtu()

2020-02-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405 Bug ID: 405 Summary: mlx5: the guest driver doesn't enforce the MTU set by rte_eth_dev_set_mtu() Product: DPDK Version: 19.11 Hardware: All OS: All Statu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 16:56, Jerin Jacob: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:40 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 21/02/2020 11:30, Jerin Jacob: > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon > > > > wrote: > > > > > If we add rte_graph to DPDK, we wi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > with '0.'. I am not familiar with the script and how libabigail works, but +1 to the idea. > > Align the specia

[dpdk-dev] [Bug 404] i40e: "i40e_res_pool_free(): Failed to find entry" error when rte_flow are flushed

2020-02-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404 Bug ID: 404 Summary: i40e: "i40e_res_pool_free(): Failed to find entry" error when rte_flow are flushed Product: DPDK Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting with '0.'. Align the special case for the glue libraries by using the soname too. Once libabigail has support for it, we will have a single type of rule. Fixes: 7

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 16:53, d...@barachs.net: > I can share a data-point with respect to constructing a reasonably functional > network stack. Original work on the project which eventually became fd.io vpp > started in 2002. I've worked on the vpp code base full-time for 18 years. > > In terms of lines of

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:40 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 21/02/2020 11:30, Jerin Jacob: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon > > > wrote: > > > Thanks for starting this discussion now. It is an interesting > > > discussio

[dpdk-dev] [Bug 403] i40e: cannot add 2 rte_flows with one matching TCP sport and the other dport

2020-02-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403 Bug ID: 403 Summary: i40e: cannot add 2 rte_flows with one matching TCP sport and the other dport Product: DPDK Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Mattias Rönnblom
On 2020-02-21 12:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 21/02/2020 11:30, Jerin Jacob: >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> Thanks for starting this discussion now. It is an interesting >>> discussion. Some thoughts below. >>>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: fix experimental library versioning

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 3:24 PM, David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:55 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> >> The problem occurred when workaround that makes soname two digits >> applied. With this change for the ABI version "20.0.1" the experimental >> library version become ".so.2001". >> After workar

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: fix experimental library versioning

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:55 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > The problem occurred when workaround that makes soname two digits > applied. With this change for the ABI version "20.0.1" the experimental > library version become ".so.2001". > After workaround removed in ABI version 21.0, the experimental

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Wang, Zhihong
> -Original Message- > From: Bie, Tiwei > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:29 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong > ; tho...@monjalon.net > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost > > I'm leaving Intel, and I'm not sure when I could

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix naming of Mellanox devices

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
The devices of the family ConnectX may have two letters as suffix. Such suffix is preceded with a space and the second x is lowercase: - ConnectX-4 Lx - ConnectX-5 Ex - ConnectX-6 Dx Uppercase of the device family name BlueField is also fixed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon --- conf

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE

2020-02-21 Thread Aaron Conole
David Marchand writes: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote: >> >> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] > > Please, get this header removed. > This is a public mailing list. > > >> Thanks Thomas for bringing this up. >> I consider this is not a new feature, but r

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: update for virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Wang, Zhihong
> -Original Message- > From: Ye, Xiaolong > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:36 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong > ; Bie, Tiwei ; > tho...@monjalon.net; Ye, Xiaolong > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: update for virtio and vhost > > I volunteer to be

Re: [dpdk-dev] Dependency issue between event/dpaa and crypto/dpaa_sec

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:16 PM David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:07 PM Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > I could not find a dependency in the makefiles for this. > > > But meson has this dependency. > > > > > > drivers/event/dpaa/meson.build > > > deps += ['pmd_dpaa', 'pmd_dpaa_sec']

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: update for virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Tiwei Bie
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:35:39PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote: > I volunteer to be co-maintainer for Vhost-user/Vhost PMD/Virtio PMD. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye > --- > MAINTAINERS | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Thanks Xiaolong for being willing to contribute on virtio and vhost w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Tiwei Bie
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 21/02/2020 14:28, Tiwei Bie: > > I'm leaving Intel, and I'm not sure when I could dedicate enough > > time to DPDK in the future. So I'm removing my name from the > > MAINTAINERS file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie > > --- > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: update for virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Xiaolong Ye
I volunteer to be co-maintainer for Vhost-user/Vhost PMD/Virtio PMD. Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye --- MAINTAINERS | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 9c22c3eb4..8e5d18235 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -855,6 +855,7 @@ F: doc/guides

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/12] introduce s390x architecture

2020-02-21 Thread Vivian Kong
Sorry for the delayed reply. We are working on updating the port to a newer version. We'd like to ask for feedback when it's ready. Regards, Vivian Kong Linux on IBM Z Open Source Ecosystem IBM Canada Toronto Lab Thomas Monjalon wrote on 2020/02/18 04:03:27 PM: > From: Thomas Monjalon > To:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 14:28, Tiwei Bie: > I'm leaving Intel, and I'm not sure when I could dedicate enough > time to DPDK in the future. So I'm removing my name from the > MAINTAINERS file. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie > --- > Xiaolong has been an active and experienced -next tree maintainer > for a long ti

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: resign from virtio and vhost

2020-02-21 Thread Tiwei Bie
I'm leaving Intel, and I'm not sure when I could dedicate enough time to DPDK in the future. So I'm removing my name from the MAINTAINERS file. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie --- Xiaolong has been an active and experienced -next tree maintainer for a long time. He also knows and loves virtio/vhost. I w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: fix experimental library versioning

2020-02-21 Thread Ray Kinsella
On 20/02/2020 19:54, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > The problem occurred when workaround that makes soname two digits > applied. With this change for the ABI version "20.0.1" the experimental > library version become ".so.2001". > After workaround removed in ABI version 21.0, the experimental library > v

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] service: stop lcore threads before 'finalize'

2020-02-21 Thread Van Haaren, Harry
> -Original Message- > From: David Marchand > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 1:25 PM > To: Van Haaren, Harry > Cc: Aaron Conole ; dev > Subject: Re: [RFC] service: stop lcore threads before 'finalize' > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:16 PM Van Haaren, Harry > wrote: > > > > We need a f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 11:30, Jerin Jacob: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Thanks for starting this discussion now. It is an interesting > > discussion. Some thoughts below. > > We can decide based on community consensus and

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/18/2020 6:01 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:38:05 + > Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >> For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures >> from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline >> functions 'struct eth_dev_ops' can't be

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] graph: introduce graph subsystem

2020-02-21 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Hi Jerin, > > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for starting this discussion now. It is an interesting > discussion. Some thoughts below. > We can decide based on community consensus and fol

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: deprecate using MAX values as array size

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/30/2020 2:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > Adding the deprecation notice as reminder for next ABI breakage release > (20.11). > This one time breakage is required to be able to extend enum/define > without breaking ABI. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rs

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] ci: fix Travis config warnings

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/02/2020 22:01, Aaron Conole: > David Marchand writes: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:03 PM Thomas Monjalon > > wrote: > >> > >> 19/02/2020 20:41, David Marchand: > >> > Reading https://config.travis-ci.com/ and using > >> > https://config.travis-ci.com/explore to check changes, we can clea

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix octeontx2 eventdev devargs

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 11:13, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:25 PM wrote: > > > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > > > Fix OCTEON TX2 event device devargs examples. > > > > Fixes: 55e778ca4648 ("event/octeontx2: add devargs for inflight buffer > > count") > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: P

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix octeontx2 eventdev devargs

2020-02-21 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:25 PM wrote: > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > Fix OCTEON TX2 event device devargs examples. > > Fixes: 55e778ca4648 ("event/octeontx2: add devargs for inflight buffer count") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh Reviewed-by: Jerin Jacob Thomas, This

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] examples/tep_term: remove redundant info get

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:41 AM Xiaoyun Li wrote: > > Removed redundant function call of 'rte_eth_dev_info_get()' since it has > already been called earlier. > > Coverity issue: 349922 > Fixes: 2bb43bd4350a ("examples/tep_term: add TSO offload configuration") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix inline packet size for ConnectX-4LX

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 7:37 AM, Matan Azrad wrote: > > > From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko >> This patch does extra inline packet size check to tune the ConnectX-4LX >> performance in the legacy Multi-Packet Write mode. >> >> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko > > Slava, Don't you think we want it for stable r

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix inline packet size for ConnectX-4LX

2020-02-21 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Ferruh Yigit > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 11:44 > To: Slava Ovsiienko ; Matan Azrad > ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix inline packet size for ConnectX-4LX > > On 2/21/2020 7:39 AM, Slava Ovsii

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix inline packet size for ConnectX-4LX

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 7:39 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Matan Azrad >> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:38 >> To: Slava Ovsiienko ; dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon >> ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix inline packet si

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix last completed built descriptor

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 8:25 AM, Matan Azrad wrote: > From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko >> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 11:18 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Matan Azrad ; Raslan Darawsheh >> ; Thomas Monjalon ; >> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix last completed built desc

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote: > > [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Please, get this header removed. This is a public mailing list. > Thanks Thomas for bringing this up. > I consider this is not a new feature, but rather a fix to address the issue > wi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update thunderx guide

2020-02-21 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:33 PM Harman Kalra wrote: > > Updating the thunderx with loopback port support, > debugging options, new features added and correcting > some formating issues. Fixed: s/formating/formatting > > Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied to dpdk-next-net

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 09:19, Zhu, TaoX: > Hi Thomas > > Thank you for your correction spelling error of 'cancel'. > > Indeed it is not the best solution by creating a thread. I refer to the same > solution with Linux kernel driver. Linux kernel driver manages link status by > using a thread. Maybe we can

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix last completed built descriptor

2020-02-21 Thread Matan Azrad
From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 11:18 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Matan Azrad ; Raslan Darawsheh > ; Thomas Monjalon ; > ferruh.yi...@intel.com; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix last completed built descriptor > > The routine sending packets with Mult

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

2020-02-21 Thread Zhu, TaoX
Hi Thomas Thank you for your correction spelling error of 'cancel'. Indeed it is not the best solution by creating a thread. I refer to the same solution with Linux kernel driver. Linux kernel driver manages link status by using a thread. Maybe we can figure out another better solution to fix

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi, 21/01/2020 01:24, Thomas Monjalon: > 02/12/2019 16:35, David Marchand: > > We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system > > has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE. > > A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your > > testpmd has been built and