Re: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] lib/lpm: R-V V rte_lpm_lookupx4

Thanks, they have been updated in v5. > -原始邮件- > 发件人: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" > 发送时间: 2025-06-11 19:52:57 (星期三) > 收件人: u...@foxmail.com, dev@dpdk.org > 抄送: "Sun Yuechi" , "Thomas Monjalon" , "Bruce Richardson" , "Stanislaw Kardach" > 主题: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] lib/lpm: R-V V rte_lpm_lookupx

Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/lpm: R-V V rte_lpm_lookupx4

Thank you for the detailed explanation, I've updated it in v4. -原始邮件- 发件人:"Medvedkin, Vladimir" 发送时间:2025-06-05 01:03:30 (星期四) 收件人: 孙越池 , dev@dpdk.org 抄送: 主题: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/lpm: R-V V rte_lpm_lookupx4 Hi Sunyuechi, On 04/06/2025 12:39, 孙越池 wrote: > w

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add RISC-V V extension detection and LPM optimization

The previous v2 patch incorrectly used --in-reply-to, which caused a warning on Patchwork. This update only corrects the Reply-To field. > -原始邮件- > 发件人: u...@foxmail.com > 发送时间: 2025-06-04 21:07:33 (星期三) > 收件人: dev@dpdk.org > 抄送: sunyuechi > 主题: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add RISC-V V extension det

Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib/lpm: R-V V rte_lpm_lookupx4

> why is it done in a scalar way instead of using `__riscv_vsrl_vx_u32m1()?` I > assume you're relying on the compiler here? I don't know the exact reason, but based on experience, using indexed loads tends to be slower for small-scale and low-computation cases. So I've tried both methods. In t