Hi Paolo,
> 2014-12-09 18:35, Paolo Bonzini:
> > Did you make any progress in Qemu/KVM community?
> > We need to be sync'ed up with them to be sure we share the same
> goal.
> > I want also to avoid using a solution which doesn't fit with
> > their plan.
> > Remember that
Hi folks and thanks,
> > Sorry, I had no time to deeply check this. I think your patch can go
> > in 1.8 as it's still an enhancement compared to the current situation.
> > We may go back on this later.
> >
> > Acked-by: Olivier Matz
>
> Applied
>
> Thanks
> --
> Thomas
I did post a V2
with ivshmem which was
> planned to be dropped.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Thomas
>
>
> 2014-10-16 15:21, Carew, Alan:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > > > However with a DPDK solution it would be possible to re-use the
> message bus
> > > > to pass inform
A comment on my own patch.
Making the size of result_buf consistent across each OS and keeping it as large
as the Linux BUFSIZ(8192) doesn't really address the core issue.
In the event that a user of librte_cmdline creates a custom context with a
result structure > 8192 bytes then this problem
Hi Thomas,
> > However with a DPDK solution it would be possible to re-use the message bus
> > to pass information like device stats, application state, D-state requests
> > etc. to the host and allow for management layer(e.g. OpenStack) to make
> > informed decisions.
>
> I think that
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 9:26 PM
> To: Carew, Alan
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] VM Power Management
>
> Hi Alan,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:10 AM
> To: Carew, Alan
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] librte_power common interface for Guest and
> Host
>
> On Wed, Sep 2
Hi Neil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 8:18 PM
> To: Carew, Alan
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] Alternate implementation of
> librte_power for VM P
Hi folks,
I am currently working on a Power Management example application for a Virtual
Machine environment running on qemu/KVM and would appreciate any feedback(with
code to share shortly).
The basic idea is to provide librte_power functionality from within a VM to
address the lack(for good
Acked-by: Alan Carew
Over eager mail filter attacked 7/8.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 2:06 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] virtio driver phase 2
>
> This is
Acked-by: Alan Carew
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 2:33 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: checkpatch cleanups
>
>
> This fixes style problems reported by
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:36 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] virtio driver phase 2
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:06:17 -0700
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carew, Alan
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 3:39 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Carew, Alan
> Subject: [PATCH 0/4] librte_pmd_virtio :Fix: virtio_pci.h non-existent virtio
> feature bit-flag tested
>
> This series addresses an i
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:08 PM
> To: Carew, Alan
> Cc: Neil Horman; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] igbuio: show irq mode in sysfs
>
> T
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 4:37 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: Carew, Alan; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] igbuio: show irq mode in sysfs
>
> On Fri, Ju
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:41 PM
To: Carew, Alan
Cc: dev at dpkd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] igb_uio patches
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:33:31 +
"Carew, Alan" wrote:
> Good catc
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:27 PM
To: Carew, Alan
Cc: dev at dpkd.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] igb_uio patches
These apply to the current DPDK tree, and are an alternative to
the patches from Alan
Hi folks,
Just to clarify, the purpose of hw.nic_uio.bdfs is to remove NICs from drivers
not owned by nic_uio and add them to a pool of unbound devices.
As with the Linux equivalent driver(igb_uio), nic_uio will then attempt to bind
any unbound NICs and make them available for DPDK.
However,
18 matches
Mail list logo
