PRBs 2014-12-02
chixiaobo Changes Requested
Brgs,
Chi Xiaobo
-Original Message-
From: ext Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:04 PM
To: Chi, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangzhou)
Cc: ext Hiroshi Shimamoto; dev at dpdk.org
, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add one option memory-only for secondary
processes
Hi,
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add one option memory-only for secondary
> processes
>
> From: Chi Xiaobo
>
> Problem: There is one nor
. Please kindly help to review and give
comments. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: chixiaobo [mailto:xiaobo@nsn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 5:41 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Chi, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangzhou)
Subject: [PATCH] add one option memory-only for those secondary PRBs
---
l
re, even in some sub-functions.
brgs,
chi xiaobo
-Original Message-
From: ext Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 9:54 PM
To: Bruce Richardson
Cc: Chi, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] one lightwight rte_eal_
Hi,
Background:
What we are doing now is port make telecom network element to be cloud based.
For one of our product, DPDK is applied not only for fastpath/dataplane
processing, but also for Distributed Message eXchange (DMX) between different
processes/applications which may located in
Hi,
I am using DPDK based shared lib, but never met such problems. Can you please
share this the result of "ldd x.so" and check if all those depended lib are
all avalible?
brgs,
chi xiaobo
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ext Newman Poborsky
6 matches
Mail list logo
