On 2014-01-29 21:47, Fran?ois-Fr?d?ric Ozog wrote:
>>> First and easy answer: it is open source, so anyone can recompile. So,
>>> what's the issue?
>>
>> I'm talking from a pure distribution perspective here: Requiring to
>> recompile all DPDK based applications to distribute a bugfix or to add
>>
On 08/26/2013 10:36 AM, David Nystr?m wrote:
> On Sat 24 Aug 2013 03:58:59 PM CEST, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 24/08/2013 05:44, Nulik Nol :
>>> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
I've sent some patches which are still waiting for review.
Anybody (including you) may review them.
>>>
>
>
>
>> I unders
On Sat 24 Aug 2013 03:58:59 PM CEST, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/08/2013 05:44, Nulik Nol :
>> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> I've sent some patches which are still waiting for review.
>>> Anybody (including you) may review them.
>>
> I understand you haven't tested them. Could you test please ?
Bu
On Fri 23 Aug 2013 12:21:41 PM CEST, David Nystr?m wrote:
> On Fri 23 Aug 2013 12:11:51 PM CEST, Nulik Nol wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have this error when compiling on Fedora 19. Any package I am
>> missing ?
>>
>> [niko at localhost dpdk-1.3.1r2]$ make config T=x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc
>
>
>> [niko at
On Fri 23 Aug 2013 12:11:51 PM CEST, Nulik Nol wrote:
> Hi,
> I have this error when compiling on Fedora 19. Any package I am missing ?
>
> [niko at localhost dpdk-1.3.1r2]$ make config T=x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc
> [niko at localhost dpdk-1.3.1r2]$ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.7
5 matches
Mail list logo