Re: [PATCH v7] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

RTE_ETHER_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_LEN is better than the previous limit. On 2022-08-08 18:42, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:38:21 +0200 > Francesco Mancino wrote: > >> Thank you for the feedback. >> >> I am sorry for the email spam, it was a learning process. >&

Re: [PATCH v7] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

:49:44 +0200 > Francesco Mancino wrote: > >> eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured >> MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. >> Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. >> >> Signed-off-

[PATCH v7] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. Signed-off-by: Francesco Mancino --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[PATCH v6] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. Signed-off-by: Francesco Mancino --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[PATCH v5] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/

[PATCH v4] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net

[PATCH v3] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/t

[PATCH v2] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. --- drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net

[PATCH] net/tap: Allow jumbo frames

eth_dev_validate_mtu, introduced in 990912e676e, validates configured MTU plus overhead against max_rx_pktlen. Since TAP is a virtual device, it should support as big MTU as possible. ---  drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net

Question about commit 44dddd14059 in DPDK e1000 driver

s different, and almost opposite. Is this intentional? In my usecase I do not manage to put the link down with the most recent DPDK (21.11), but it worked fine with 19.11. Should a configure something differently? Best regards, Francesco Mancino