> -Original Message-
> From: Anand Sunkad
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:22 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Vivek Gupta ; Thomas
> Mulamangalath ; Anand Sunkad
>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mem
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Just to double check if anyone is looking into the bind() error issue which is
> since following commit, I am waiting for more input on it.
>
> Commit b923866c6974 ("net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name")
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
Definitely an issue, I must
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 6:33 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/memif: fix invalid unix do
> Why does this not use abstract unix domain socket naming?
> That would be much less error prone, because then the socket would
> disappear when all applications using it are closed.
How would that work with containers? I'll consider that for a new patch, maybe
it could be optional?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anand Sunkad
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:21 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Vivek Gupta ; Thomas
> Mulamangalath ; Anand Sunkad
>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mem
> -Original Message-
> From: Ye Xiaolong
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:43 AM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface
> (memif) PMD
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 11:24 AM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface
> (memif) PMD
>
From: Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 9:58 PM
To: Jakub Grajciar; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v5] /net: memory interface (memif)
On 3/22/2019 11:57 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Memory interface (memif), provides high performance
> p
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 6:27 AM
To: Jakub Grajciar; Ferruh Yigit; dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
Cc: nd; nd
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v5] /net: memory interface (memif)
> On 3/22/2019 11:57 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:22 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v8] /net: memory interface (memif)
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 13:46:58 +0200
> Jakub Grajciar wrote:
>
> > +enum memif_role_t {
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:29 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v9] /net: memory interface (memif)
> > +
> > +.. csv
Hi Ferruh,
> Hi Jakub,
>
> While testing your zero-copy patch [1], I stuck to a bind() error [2].
> When provided a socket length bigger than "sizeof(struct sockaddr)", bind()
> fails. I am testing this on a Fedora system.
> I wonder if there is a check in glibc related to the length.
Z
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Phil Yang
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 7:00 PM
> > To: jgraj...@cisco.com; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; jer...@marvell.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > ; damar...@cisco.com; nd
>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/memif:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Phil Yang
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 7:00 PM
> > > > To: jgraj...@cisco.com; dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; jer...@marvell.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > ; damar...@cisco.com; nd
> > >
> > > > Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Yang
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 4:05 AM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Damjan Marion (damarion)
> ; honnappa.nagarah
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:07 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: anatoly.bura...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/memif: zero-copy slave
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 7:21 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
> Cisco)
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: [RFC v3] net/memif: allow for full key size in socket n
17 matches
Mail list logo
