ceive data on the bonded port
as wanted.
Is there a way to allow DPDK to change the mac address so I avoid the
workaround ? I have done some searching but couldn't find anything.
Regards,
Jesper Wramberg
2015-10-09 0:29 GMT+02:00 Olga Shern :
> For the sake of clarity, I assume you mean the patches ab
t; Hi Jesper,
>
> Bonding pmd is not supported with dpdk 2.1 on Mellanox nic
> We just sent patches to support async link events. Without these patches
> it will not work.
>
> Best Regards
> Olga
> Sent from Samsung Mobile.
>
>
> Original message ---
be causing this behavior ?
I am running fw version 2.30.x which I have considered upgrading. Besides
this I have been wondering if I have to do anything in Linux since the PMD
uses the Linux drivers for control. I haven't been able to find any
information on it though.
Regards,
Jesper Wramberg
Hey there,
Thanks for your help. I checked the eth_ixgbevf_dev_init() function against
DPDK 2.0 but did think about changes in the eth_ixgbe_dev_init() function.
Anyway, I have just been using 2.0 for now but it's nice to know I wasn't
doing anything wrong :-)
Regards,
Jesper Wramberg
2015-09
Hi all,
I got a Dell PowerEdge R630 with an X520 NIC. I want to set up two VFs that
use the first port on the NIC. I've done the following:
1. Edited kernel params to include iommu=pt and intel_iommu=1
2. Executed the following
modprobe uio
insmod igb_uio
./dpdk_nic_bind.py -b igb_uio bb:ss.f
5 matches
Mail list logo