> On Nov 20, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>> On Nov 19, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Aleksey Baulin wrote:
>>
>> #ifndef unlikely
>> -#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x),0)
>> +#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>
> I have not looked at the generated code, but does this add
KNI isn’t supported on FreeBSD.
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Mostafa Salari wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I can't make my DPDK application on FreeBSD, and i give the following error
>fatal error: rte_kni.h: No such file or directory
>#include
> In, ubuntu and debian, I load rte_kni.ko bef
Bakari,
This is so you can have > 1 DPDK application on a machine and they won't use
each other's hugepages.
See, for example the comments in clear_hugedir()
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c#n198
Jim
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 9:16 PM, 白长敏 <912873..
Michael,
There is no PMD for RPi, so you'll have to run AF_PACKET (librte_pmd_packet) or
simila via tap interfacesr.
DPDK-IN-A-BOX is designed (by Dave Hunt at Intel) to provide an easy startup
and introduction to DPDK.
https://dpdksummit.com/Archive/pdf/2016USA/Day02-Session16-DaveHunt-DPDKU
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Vincent JARDIN
> wrote:
>
> Le 02/03/2016 11:51, Jim Thompson a ?crit :
>> Can we take it as a requirement to support FreeBSD this time around?
>
> Of course, all OS should be on the loop, but I guess, it would be per kernel
> s
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:47 AM, Vincent JARDIN
> wrote:
>
> Le 02/03/2016 09:27, Panu Matilainen a ?crit :
I'd like to see these be merged.
Jay
>>>
>>> The code is really not ready. I am okay with cooperative development
>>> but the current code needs to go into a staging type tr
AVX-512 in Xeon Phi Knights Landing and Skylake Xeon seems ideal for Hyperscan.
-- Jim
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Padam Jeet Singh
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading up on the Xeon Phi processors - up to 61 cores?.. looks very
> interesting. Has anyone tried offloading packet processing
The following files have LGPL or GPL licenses. I can see the libretto_eal and
the four files that are part of DTS being GPL, but there others seem like a
mistake.
Especially the docs, and the presence of the LICENSE.LGPL file.
Is it possible to clean these up and make them BSD licensed?
Jim
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:37:18PM +0200, Martin Dra?ar wrote:
>> Dne 1.9.2015 v 15:45 De Lara Guarch, Pablo napsal(a):
>>> 82574L NIC uses em PMD, which does not support more than 1 queue.
>>> Therefore RSS is disabled in the NIC and then yo
> On May 4, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
>>> What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread mode
>>> is important for patch review.
>>
>> Like
> On Apr 26, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/15, 8:30 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24/04/15 19:51, Matthew Hall wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:44 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:22:43AM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>>
>>> The kernel does this with some special make targ
> On Mar 20, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> The kernel does this with some special make targets (make allyesconfig, make
> randconfig, etc)
Not all the world is Linux.
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Stephen Hemminger networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:53:34 +0800
> zhihong.wang at intel.com wrote:
>
>> Main code changes:
>>
>> 1. Differentiate architectural features based on CPU flags
>>
>>a. Implement separated move functions for
I?m not as concerned with compile times given the potential performance boost.
A long time ago (mid-80s) I was at Convex, and wanted to do a vector bcopy(),
because it would make the I/O system (mostly disk then (*)) go faster.
The architect explained to me that the vector registers were for app
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:09 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 5:18 PM
>> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-de
The issues are outlined in this paper:
http://www.ndsl.kaist.edu/~shinae/papers/TR-symRSS.pdf
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Kamraan Nasim
> wrote:
>
> Hi DPDK community,
>
> Any better RSS hash keys out there?
>
> --Kam
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Kamraan Nasim sidebandnetworks.
Then you don?t understand licensing.
the GPL has a requirement that you make one of two offers:
The fourth section for version 2 of the license and the seventh section of
version 3 require that programs distributed as pre-compiled binaries are
accompanied by a copy of the source code, or a wri
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>
> Hi Yerden,
>
> On 09/08/2014 12:33 PM, Yerden Zhumabekov wrote:
>> 08.09.2014 16:17, Olivier MATZ ?:
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
uint32_t
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 5:16 AM, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>
> Matthew Hall wrote:
>> However despite this issue, there are some cases where the Linux stack is
>> greatly superior to the BSD one although normally the opposite is the
>> case...
>> AF_NETLINK for configuring 10,000+ IP addresses, e
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 11:20 PM, Matthew Hall wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:49:44AM +0800, zimeiw wrote:
>> I have porting major FreeBSD tcp/ip stack to dpdk. new tcp/ip stack is based
>> on dpdk rte_mbuf, rte_ring, rte_memory and rte_table. it is faster to
>> forwarding packets.
>
> He
21 matches
Mail list logo
