[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/17] Enhance mlx5 with Mellanox OFED 3.1

My laboratory (an.kaist.ac.kr) had tried to build a native kernel driver for mlx4 a few months ago, and sent the full patch to the patchwork system: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6128/ This driver supports only minimal RX/TX of packets, and many standard features such as VLAN are missing. Th

[dpdk-dev] Is there any example application to used DPDK packet distributor library?

Hello, DPDK already provides a number of example applications: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/examples You may find my projects to be useful as well: https://github.com/anlab-kaist/pspgen-dpdk & https://github.com/anlab-kaist/NBA ps. DPDK is not a packet "distributor" library but more close to "

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf & mempool: explicit typecast on function return

I already have fixed this issue at http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6068/ . There is another issue related to "underlying type" for enum declarations http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6067/, for C++11 compilers. In the second patch I missed updating headers for architectures other than x86,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: Fix compilation on C++

* Forward declaration of enum in C++ requires explicit underlying type definitions. * This fixes the issue at: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/017065.html Signed-off-by: Joongi Kim --- lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_cpuflags.h | 4 ++-- lib/librte_eal/common

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] lib: Fix pointer arithmetic for C++

included by C++ sources. Signed-off-by: Joongi Kim --- lib/librte_malloc/malloc_elem.h | 4 ++-- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 2 +- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib

[dpdk-dev] Too verbose PMD init logs - intended or not?

Thanks for quick reply. I have been using the v2.0.0 release branch, and switching to the master eliminates the issue. - Joongi On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:14 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-05-13 08:47, Joongi Kim: > > Hello, > > I found that the followin

[dpdk-dev] Too verbose PMD init logs - intended or not?

Hello, I found that the following commit and post are conflicting with each other: 1) http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=23f91f32f2b119f1376488d87be2b80b078a945e 2) http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016361.html Is there a consensus on how verbose PMD init processes should be? (i.e., Is