Hi,
last week I sent a question about VMDq and I did not get any reply.
Today I'll be more generic rather than last time, and I hope someone will
clarify my ideas.
Through the DPDK framework, is it possible to make a pre-filter based on some
header parameter directly on the NIC (in addition to t
Hi everyone,
we are working with Flow DIRector on a multiprocess application. This
application consists of N secondary processes, each one receiving packets
directly from its own queue on the NIC. It works fine when each secondary
process runs on a different CPU core; instead, if we try to run t
ruce.richardson at intel.com
> To: mauroannarumma at hotmail.it; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Issues on FDIR and multi-processes
> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:33:09 +
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mau
Hi,
I'm trying to use Flow Director. Initially I used a X540 chipset and I was not
able to make it work; I thought it was a compatibility problem with the
controller. Maxime suggested to change some lines in the ixgbe_fdir.c file, I
changed these lines but it
did not give the expected resu
x
> Done
> testpmd>
>
>
> Perhaps you could also try turning on some of the IXGBE debug options in your
> compile time config e.g. defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc. Setting
> "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_INIT" and
> "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_
Hi,
I have some doubts on the DPDK multi-process support:
1) According to the Programmers Guide (pag. 109 - 20.3 Multi-process
Limitations), one of the multi-process limitations is:
"All Intel? DPDK processes running as a single application and using shared
memory must have distinct coremask ar
Hi Bruce,
just for dispel
any doubt: if there is one primary process and N secondary processes,
and each process uses only one logical core (they have a coremask equal
to 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, ), I can run at the same time at most "my CPU logical
cores - 1" secondary processes. Is it right?
7 matches
Mail list logo