Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-12-11 Thread Michael Lilja
To: Michael Lilja > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Finn Christensen ; Bent Kuhre > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > Hi Michael, > > 20/04/2020 07:05, Michael Lilja: > > Actually the open-source driver development has been on hold until > just recently, due to other prio

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-19 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman > Sent: 19. april 2020 23:16 > To: Michael Lilja > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Finn Christensen > ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre ; > techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:4

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-04-16 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman > Sent: 17. april 2020 04:55 > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: Finn Christensen ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:07:12PM +

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Michael Lilja
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: 31. marts 2020 14:45 > To: Michael Lilja > Cc: Neil Horman ; Finn Christensen > ; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > 31/03/2020 14:39, Michael Lilja: > > Hi, > &

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2020-03-31 Thread Michael Lilja
; dev@dpdk.org; Bent Kuhre > ; Michael Lilja ; techbo...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd > > 31/03/2020 14:17, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:25:25PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Raising this topic again

Re: [dpdk-dev] Napatech pmd

2018-01-09 Thread Michael Lilja
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 08/01/2018 14:08, Finn Christensen: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion up again. > > > > > > The Napatech PMD is build on top of our proprietary driver. The > reason is basically that we

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Please fix while applying. -Original Message- From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] Sent: 17 May 2017 17:17 To: Michael Lilja ; helin.zh...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times On 5

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v8: * Merged two defines into one handling max wait time v7: * Code style changes v6: * Fixed code style issues v5

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Ok, I'll make a v8 removing the define. /Michael -Original Message- From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] Sent: 17 May 2017 16:50 To: Michael Lilja ; helin.zh...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
rruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] Sent: 17 May 2017 16:44 To: Michael Lilja ; helin.zh...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times On 5/17/2017 3:31 PM, Michael Lilja wrote: > Previously, the FDI

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v7: * Code style changes v6: * Fixed code style issues v5: * Reinitialization of "i" inconsistent wit

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v6: * Fixed code style issues v5: * Reinitialization of "i" inconsistent with original intent v4: * Code

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v5: * Reinitialization of "i" inconsistent with original intent --- --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_f

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/i40e: improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v4: * Code style fix --- --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: Improved FDIR programming times

2017-05-16 Thread Michael Lilja
Previously, the FDIR programming time is +11ms on i40e. This patch will result in an average programming time of 22usec with a max of 60usec . Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v3: * Code style fix --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 21 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c: Improved i40e FDIR programming times

2017-05-11 Thread Michael Lilja
. Could the following patch be useful? There might be a good reason for the original code, I'm unable to tell, so I will let it up to the maintainer to decide. Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- v2: * Code style fix --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 21 + 1 file change

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c: Improved i40e FDIR programming times

2017-04-26 Thread Michael Lilja
+11ms. Could the following patch be useful? There might be a good reason for the original code, I'm unable to tell, so I will let it up to the maintainer to decide. Signed-off-by: Michael Lilja --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 16 +++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 dele