On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 10:53 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 07/02/2023 15:42, ohily...@iol.unh.edu:
> > From: Owen Hilyard
> >
> > I (Owen Hilyard) am stepping down as a DTS maintainer.
>
> Thanks for your work Owen, you will be missed.
> Hope we'll see you aga
Everything looks good to me with the exception of some issues I ran into
with terminal codes. Setting TERM=dumb before running fixed it, but we
might want to set that inside of DTS since I can't think of a reason why we
would need colors or any of the other "fancy" features of the vt220, and
settin
address will send the email to everyone involved with DPDK here at UNH so
you will usually get faster response times.
Sorry for any inconvenience
Owen Hilyard
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:03 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> Again, apologies for removing recipients in my earlier reply.
>
>
>
> *From:* Owen Hilyard
> *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2022 1:40 PM
> *To:* Juraj Linkeš
> *Subject:* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] dts: add dpdk execu
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> This is the base class that all test suites inherit from. The base class
> implements methods common to all test suites. The derived test suites
> implement tests and any particular setup needed for the suite or tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jura
You are missing type annotations throughout this.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> Provide a summary of testcase passed/failed/blocked counts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> ---
> dts/framework/dts.py| 3 ++
> dts/framework/stats_reporter.py | 65 +
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> Setup hugepages on nodes. This is useful not only on SUT nodes, but
> also on TG nodes which use TGs that utilize hugepages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> ---
> dts/framework/remote_session/__init__.py | 1 +
> dts/framework/remot
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> Add methods for setting up and shutting down DPDK apps and for
> constructing EAL parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> ---
> dts/conf.yaml | 4 +
> dts/framework/config/__init__.py |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
> Add the ability to build DPDK and apps, using a configured target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> ---
> dts/framework/exception.py| 17 +++
> dts/framework/remote_session/os/os_session.py | 90 +++-
> .../re
er
> lint=false
> ;;
> - *)
> + ?)
> + usage
> + exit 1
> esac
> done
> +shift $(($OPTIND - 1))
>
> +directory=${1:-$(dirname $0)/../dts}
> +cd $directory || exit 1
>
> errors=0
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Owen Hilyard
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 11:23 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > 04/11/2022 12:05, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > All the necessary code needed to connect to a node in a topology with
> > > a bit more, such as basic logging and some extra useful methods.
> >
> > Applie
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:37 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
> + Lijuan, Owen, Juraj
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 7:02 AM
> > To: Aman Singh ; Yuying Zhang
> >
> > Cc: david.march...@redhat.com; dev@d
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> I was about to merge this series,
> and after long thoughts, it deserves a bit more changes.
> I would like to work with you for a merge in 22.11-rc3.
>
> 13/10/2022 12:35, Juraj Linkeš:
> > All the necessary code needed to connect to a nod
s.
> Reworked SSH implementation - split it so that the split between an
> abstraction and the actual implementation is clearer.
> Modified the directory structure to better organize the current and the
> future code.
>
> Juraj Linkeš (9):
> dts: add project tools config
> d
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:57 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:55:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > >
> > > > +self.session = pxssh.pxssh(encoding="utf-8")
> > > > +self.
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:46 AM Bruce Richardson <
> bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:55:46AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > The class adds logging and history records to existing pexpect
> > methods.
>
> > +# Frozen makes the object immutable. This enables further optimizations,
> > +# and makes it thread safe should we every want to move in that
> direction.
> > +@dataclass(slots=True, frozen=True)
> > +class NodeConfiguration:
> > +name: str
> > +hostname: str
> > +user: str
> > +
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:55:46AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > The class adds logging and history records to existing pexpect methods.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Owen Hilyard
> > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš
> > ---
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:55:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
> > +self.session = pxssh.pxssh(encoding="utf-8")
> > +self.session.login(
> > +self.node,
> > +self.username,
> > +self.password,
> > +
; static analysis Isort, import sorting
> > > > >
> > > > > .editorconfig modifies the line length to 88, which is the default
> > > > > Black uses. It seems to be the best of all worlds. [0]
> > > > >
> > > > > [0]
> &
widespread use.
Additionally, "binary compatible" distros will have a single distro
selected for testing. For example, RHEL 7 will be treated as providing
testing for CentOS 7.
Owen Hilyard
UNH InterOperability Lab
This meeting had a lot of book-keeping. In previous meetings we've had to
skip reviewing some action items due to time constraints. This meeting we
had time to review most of them, so we have a larger-than-normal "Review
Action Items" section.
Attendees
-
Owen Hilyard
t; Hi everyone,
>
> First of all thanks Owen for stepping forward with this RFC.
> Few thoughts on this subject below.
> Konstantin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 12:59 PM
> > To: Ananyev, Konsta
y plan is to leave unit testing in
C, but help make it easier to expose C functions to Python for integration
testing. This gives us the best of both worlds in terms of access to DPDK
and the ability to use a high-level language to write the tests.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:07 AM Jerin Jacob wro
>
> 3) In my private discussions with David Marchand, he expressed interest
> in getting the git log history. The current review process will not help in
> this regard. Is this a must? If yes, are there any known methods to do this?
The git docs point to https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo
>
> scheme is probably over-engineered
I tried my hardest to keep this as simple as possible. The requirements
imposed by DTS being a distributed system in Python restricted what I could
do a lot. Needing to be compatible with DPDK's license also got rid of a
lot of options. Binding generators ar
Attendees
-
Owen Hilyard
-
Honnappa Nagarahalli
-
Lijuan Tu
-
Lincoln Lavoie
Agenda
-
Additions to the agenda
-
Review/Carry forward pending action items
-
Review DTS DPDK Modifications excel sheet
-
Merging DTS into DPDK
-
Review
The latest script in CI correctly selects 'next-net' for this patch.
>
r something similar that is designed to
perform cross-language RPC easily, in which case directly exposing RPC in C
might be much easier.
Owen Hilyard
Currently, DTS tests DPDK via the example applications (/examples) and the
apps (/app) included with DPDK. The DTS Working group has been trying to
move to primarily using Testpmd, since it is the most complete and only
using one application causes less maintenance work. Since Testpmd provides
a te
The Community CI hasn't been able to schedule downtime to update dpdk-ci
across all of our systems since the refactoring Ali did. However, the patch
was still applied on next-net and had a compilation error. See
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/20895/. It was applied
onto
https://gi
After some discussion in the working group, we decided that this is mostly
a question of what the labs can support. The UNH Lab uses the version of
python that ships with the latest Ubuntu LTS, which is 3.8. The Intel Lab
is in a similar situation. Are there any objections to python 3.8 with
update
, 2022Attendees
-
Owen Hilyard
-
Lincoln Lavoie
-
Lijuan Tu
-
Juraj Linkes
-
Honnappa Nagarahalli
Agenda
-
Review/Carry forward pending action items
-
Merging DTS into DPDK
-
Review additional work items
MinutesReview/Carry forward pending
Community CI Lab perspective is that versions higher than 3.8 are not
acceptable due to the issues with changing the default Python installation
on Ubuntu. This may be raised to 3.10 in June of this year after we have
had time to evaluate the 22.04 release of Ubuntu.
Owen Hilyard
/edit
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:23 AM Juraj Linkeš
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Owen Hilyard
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:08 PM
> *To:* dev ; d...@dpdk.org
> *Subject:* [RFC] DTS Commit Policies
>
>
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> The DTS Work
purpose of the commit policies is to help standardize the code that
makes up DTS, as well as help new additions meet community requirements,
such as avoiding breaking changes, ensuring runtime stability, and aiding
debugability.
Owen Hilyard
DTS Working Group meeting room:
https://armltd.zoom.us/j
Our windows servers are both running 0.57.1, but all of the *nix hosts are
running 0.58.1. This issue also happens on 0.57.1 and 0.57.2, with the
exact same steps to reproduce.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 11:38 AM Dmitry Kozlyuk
wrote:
> 2021-08-03 11:11 (UTC-0400), Owen Hilyard:
> > It s
It seems like meson encountered an error when building
app/test/meson.build:472:11: ERROR: Index 1 out of bounds of array of size
> 1.
>
> A full log can be found at
> /home-local/jenkins-local/jenkins-agent/workspace/Apply-Custom-Patch-Set/dpdk/build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
> ninja: error: loadi
te:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:11 AM David Marchand
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 8:48 PM Owen Hilyard
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > As part of the community lab's work to deploy static analysis tools,
>
That test suite has been disabled on the system. Someone of the Intel team
should be looking at it soon, since stats_checks also has similar issues.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:40 AM David Marchand
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:26 AM David Marchand
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:
.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:34 AM Aaron Conole wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger writes:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:51:37 -0400
> > Owen Hilyard wrote:
> >
> >> Working backward to the define
> >> statement, AEU_INPUTS_ATTN_BI
r as I know, some of these
drivers don't have DTS run on them in the course of CI, so I'm somewhat
wary of trying to make a change to them. Until this is fixed, deploying
UBSAN in any real capacity won't be useful since every patch will fail.
What do the two of you think about steps moving forward on this problem?
Owen Hilyard
Hi Dmitry,
Those failures are the result of a known issue with that machine. Those
tests were disabled on that machine shortly after you submitted that patch.
I've re-run the patch.
Owen Hilyard
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk
wrote:
> 2021-06-09 12:01 (UTC-0400),
ce the log itself is too
large for the mailing list.
Test Output:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NejCuba-HnvH9MMg7thBdGuOhQBXKiFh/view?usp=sharing
Owen Hilyard
The Intel 10G and Intel 40G systems at the community lab had test jobs
begin to crash a few hours ago. This was the result of DTS crashing
severely enough that the job was unable to continue. A brief investigation
makes it seem like the "-a" flag for testpmd has been removed, which is
causing the t
ould submit a ticket to get a
feature like that added into testpmd. I'd also appreciate any ideas for
test cases.
Thanks
Owen Hilyard
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 5:12 AM Burakov, Anatoly
wrote:
> On 30-Jul-20 5:54 PM, Owen Hilyard wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice.
> >
> > I was wondering about the state of the "Setup VFIO permissions" option
> > in the setup script. It seems to just modify t
29, 2020 at 11:35 AM Burakov, Anatoly
wrote:
> On 29-Jul-20 3:34 PM, Owen Hilyard wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I was wondering what everyone's thoughts on doing both userspace testing
> > and unprivileged testing of dpdk applications is. DTS currently runs all
>
Hello all,
I was wondering what everyone's thoughts on doing both userspace testing
and unprivileged testing of dpdk applications is. DTS currently runs all
commands on the tester and the dut as the root user. Please correct me if
I'm wrong, but I was under the assumption that most applications wr
-- Forwarded message -
From: Owen Hilyard
Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:04 AM
Subject: Request for High Priority Features
To:
Hello Everyone,
Those of us at the IOL have been working on new DTS test cases for a while
now, and we are starting to get to the point where we&#x
test cases for
this feature are also welcome.
Thanks for your help,
Owen Hilyard
to an
existing version, or drop the protocol from the test matrix without
community input.
Thoughts?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:54 AM Owen Hilyard wrote:
> I can do that.
>
> Thanks for the clarification
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
>
>>
I can do that.
Thanks for the clarification
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> > > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test.
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on this?
>
> I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc.
>
>
>
Hello,
In regards to the outer layers, having grepped through the code for
"[\w_]+_GOOD|[\w_]+_BAD", I wasn't able to find the flags that I expected.
I expected something like PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD and
PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_GOOD to show up since that seems to be the format for
flags to be prin
to enable these checks aside from the checksum aside from
TestChecksumOffload::checksum_enablehw.
Thanks,
Owen Hilyard
Software Developer
UNH Interoperability Lab
55 matches
Mail list logo
