t; so the software application will then have to recompute the checksum
> itself if needed.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 629
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Paolo Valerio
> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang
> ---
> v3: Up
M_UNKNOWN,
> so the software application will then have to recompute the checksum
> itself if needed.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 629
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Paolo Valerio
> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang
> --
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Wang, Haiyue
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 20:57
>> To: David Marchand
>> Cc: dev ; pvale...@redhat.com; Aaron Conole
>> ; Zhang, Qi Z
>> ; Rong, Leyi ; Tu, Lijuan
>> ; dpdk
>> stable ; Guo, Jia ; Richardson, Bruce
>> ;
>> Ana
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
> Hi Paolo,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Wang, Haiyue
>> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 10:02
>> To: Paolo Valerio
>> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Aaron Conole ;
>> dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: RE: ixgbe and UDP with z
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
> Hi Paolo,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paolo Valerio
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 21:50
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Wang, Haiyue ;
>> Aaron Conole
>>
>> Subject: ixgbe and U
Hi,
performing some tests, I noticed that on ixgbe when receiving UDP
packets with zero checksum (no checksum) over IPv4, the corresponding
ol_flag for the l4 checksum is set to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD.
In particular, this apparently has an impact on OvS using ct() action
where UDP packets with zero
6 matches
Mail list logo