RE: [PATCH 24.03 1/8] eventdev: add capability flags for supported sched types

2023-11-21 Thread Pathak, Pravin
Ideally, supporting ORing of schedule types during queue creation would have been best. But advertising all such possible combinations will be a nightmare. But this will allow flexibility to create an exact combination HW can support. Either support all or a subset of it. -Original Message

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: Ipsec-secgw packet processing

2020-08-31 Thread Pathak, Pravin
HI Satya - Do you mean packets are not at all seen at the output OR packets are seen but data is not encrypted with just ESP headers added? This is what I see with Cypto NULL device and I think is expected behavior of NULL device. Pravin -Original Message- From: users On Behalf Of An

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] eventdev: add support for enqueue reorder

2024-07-10 Thread Pathak, Pravin
>+ Add a device-level >+ RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_INDEPENDENT_ENQ >+ as well. >+ The documentation of that flag should probably house the detailed >description of this feature. So, this capability will be advertised by DSW and DLB devices with detailed documentation. What about DPAA and OPDL devices

RE: [PATCH v6 2/3] eventdev: add support for independent enqueue

2024-07-29 Thread Pathak, Pravin
> On 2024-07-11 21:54, Abdullah Sevincer wrote: > > This commit adds support for independent enqueue feature and updates > > Event Device and PMD feature list. > > > > A new capability RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_INDEPENDENT_ENQ is introduced to > > support independent enqueue to support PMD to enqueue in an

RE: [PATCH v8 2/3] eventdev: add support for independent enqueue

2024-08-24 Thread Pathak, Pravin
> -Original Message- > From: Mattias Rönnblom > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 7:03 AM > To: Sevincer, Abdullah ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: jer...@marvell.com; Richardson, Bruce ; > Pathak, Pravin ; mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com; > Aggarwal, Manish > Subject: Re: [PAT

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] eventdev: add support for enqueue reorder

2024-07-02 Thread Pathak, Pravin
>+ Add a device-level >+ RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_INDEPENDENT_ENQ >+ as well. >+ The documentation of that flag should probably house the detailed >description of this feature. So, this capability will be advertised by DSW and DLB devices with detailed documentation. >+ Here's how I would describe t