[dpdk-dev] check_port_config error

A socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:1521 net_e1000_igb L3FWD: Longest-prefix match selected L3FWD: IPV6 is specifiednsoft parse-ptype is enabled port 0 is not present on the board EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 Cause: check_port_config failed Thanks, Pragash Vijayaragavan Grad Student at Roc

Re: [dpdk-dev] cuckoo hash in dpdk

modulo was substituted with "shr" and > "and". > > So basically nowadays there is no need to worry about that and > complicate code with explicit low-level optimizations. Hope that > answers your question. > > Regards, > Andriy > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at

Re: [dpdk-dev] cuckoo hash in dpdk

h is less clock cycles than normal division i guess :) Thanks, Pragash Vijayaragavan Grad Student at Rochester Institute of Technology email : pxv3...@rit.edu ph : 585 764 4662 On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Pragash Vijayaragavan wrote: > Hi , > > The performance will depend on the ti

Re: [dpdk-dev] cuckoo hash in dpdk

functions. Thanks, Pragash Vijayaragavan Grad Student at Rochester Institute of Technology email : pxv3...@rit.edu ph : 585 764 4662 On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian < cristian.dumitre...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > Fr

[dpdk-dev] cuckoo hash in dpdk

operation on (RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1), which might be faster. We did a cuckoo filter for VPP and doing this gave a slight improvement in speed. Is there any particular reason its done this way. Sorry if i am being wrong in any way, i was just curious. Thanks, Pragash Vijayaragavan Grad