Re: Commit broke 32-bit testpmd app

: Monday, January 30, 2023 at 3:29 PM To: Maxime Coquelin <mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>, chenbo@intel.com<mailto:chenbo@intel.com> <mailto:chenbo@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> Cc: Roger Melton (rmelton)

Re: Commit broke 32-bit testpmd app

) <mailto:spee...@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:08 PM To: Maxime Coquelin <mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>, chenbo@intel.com<mailto:chenbo@intel.com> <mailto:chenbo@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <mailto:dev@dp

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

Hi Igor, Thanks for the help. I’ll be happy to test patches when you are ready. Regards, Roger From: "Chauskin, Igor" Date: Friday, December 18, 2020 at 4:29 PM To: "Roger Melton (rmelton)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "m...@semihalf

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

ot;Roger Melton (rmelton)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "m...@semihalf.com" , "Tzalik, Guy" Subject: RE: DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors Hi Roger, Thanks for reporting this. Your suggestion seems like a valid workaround, we’ll work on prep

[dpdk-dev] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors

We are seeing issues with the DPDK 18.11 ENA PMD incrementing rx_errors stat on good packets (checksum later validated by software). We’ve tried several versions from DPDK 18.11 stable, including 18.11.9 and 18.11.10. Looking through ENA PMD commits, I see there have been a number of rx stats