It is good that RC1 on Jan.11th is a hard deadline. We also need ensure that
RC1 is a complete package with all features. If RC1 is out but missing some big
features, then the test results on RC1 vs RC2 may have big difference.
So, could we ensure that RC1 is a complete feature package, if any
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 4:11 PM
To: Wang, Zhihong ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: mst at redhat.com; dev at dpdk.org; vkaplans at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: Add indirect
In my BDW-EP platform(similar to HSW), I can also see the performance drop. So
what's the next step now?
Intel CPU GEN:
SNB-->IVB--->HSW-->BDW-EP
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 6:53 PM
To: Yuanhan
Yuanhan
So we will get the package for testing on Oct.26th, right? Thx.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:27 PM
To: dpdk stable
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 16.07.1 stable patches review and
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Apply patch to dpdk-next-virtio: Pass
- Compile: Pass
- OS: Ubuntu16.04 4.4.0-34-generic
- GCC: 5.4.0
Test Case - Pass, over 20% performance gain for big packet(1024B), and it's
designed to improve big packet performance.
- Test case: Without NIC, Vhost dequeuer, virtio
.
Virtio_user is also a virtual device, do we need to change the name,too?
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 11:23 AM
To: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4
Oh, thx for the info, it's better to have some documentation update in R16.11
release notes.
-Original Message-
From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 11:14 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev
[mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2016 3:03 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] vhost: add dequeue zero copy
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:37:27PM +, Xu, Qian Q wrote:
> this function copy_desc_to_mbuf has chan
See the bottom.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:13 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] vhost: add dequeue zero copy
The basic idea of dequeue
Thx for the clarification. As to the naming, although it's a little confusing,
if people are fine with it, I'm fine.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 6:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin
to be a same number.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:00 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] vhost: add a flag to enable Tx zero copy
Just curious
Just curious about the naming: vhost USER TX Zero copy. In fact, it's Vhost RX
zero-copy
For virtio, it's Virtio TX zero-copy. So, I wonder why we call it as Vhost TX
ZERO-COPY,
Any comments?
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent:
Lei
Could you list the test setup for below findings? I think we need at least to
check below tests for mergeable=on/off path:
1. Vhost/virtio loopback
2. PVP test : virtio-pmd IO fwd and virtio-net IPV4 fwd
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yao,
essage-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:33 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu ; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support
I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vho
I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vhost PMD, and
virtio user interface. I didn't see any performance gains in this scenario. All
packet size from 64B to 1518B
performance haven't got benefit from this patchset, and in fact, the
performance dropped a lot before 1280B,
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:19 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] vhost: simplify features set/get
On 08/25/2016 05:03 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On
OK, it's better to claim that his patchset have the dependency on another one.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:40 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6
I think you need also update vhost sample guide and vhost library in the
programmer guide for this release.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 4:49 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Yuanhan Liu
Subject:
I want to apply the patch on the latest DPDK, see below commit ID but failed
since no vhost.h and vhost-user.h files. So do you have any dependency on other
patches?
commit 28d8abaf250c3fb4dcb6416518f4c54b4ae67205
Author: Deirdre O'Connor
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:20:08 2016 +0100
doc: fix
.
Users may think it's a bug of R16.07 since R16.04 didn't check that. From my
view, crc-strip is not a "MUST" check for the port start. We can configure the
value after
the port start.
Any thoughts?
From: Yao, Lei A
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 9:36 AM
To: Topel, Bjorn
Cc: Xu, Qian Q
Subj
Tan, Jianfeng
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong ; Xu, Qian Q
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] examples/vhost: fix perf regression
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:42:45AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> We find significant perfermance drop introduced by below commit, when
> vhost example is started with --me
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel(R) Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+
- Total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed.
My comments below.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:44 AM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: fix perf regression
Hi Yuanhan,
On
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed.
1. The test scenario is Vhost-Virtio loopback without
Do we need patch qemu for the reconnect case?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 2:40 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Xie, Huawei; Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add vhost-user
: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Mcnamara, John; Xu, Qian Q
Subject: [PATCH v2] doc: add section on tested platforms and nics
Add a new section on tested platforms and nics to the release notes.
Signed-off-by: Qian Xu
Signed-off-by: John McNamara
---
V2:
- Moved text to release notes.
- Made mailing list
for the tested nics and
platforms. Then how about putting them in one session of release notes?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Mcnamara, John
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 6:05 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon; Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms
Jianbo
Could you tell me the case that can reproduce the issue? We can help evaluate
the impact of performance on ixgbe, but I'm not sure how to check if your patch
really fix a problem because I don?t know how to reproduce the problem! Could
you first teach me on how to reproduce your issue?
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel(R) Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+
- Total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed.
Marc
#Test1 is just a simple test. Just launch testpmd with these nic port.
./testpmd ?c 0x3 ?n 4 -- -i
Thanks
Qian
From: marc.sune at gmail.com [mailto:marc.s...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:48 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu
in several days.
Thanks
Qian
From: marc.sune at gmail.com [mailto:marc.s...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:54 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8
It's a regression, vmxnet3 can work with dpdk2.2, but now it can't work well.
Yong,
Heng found that your patch may be the first one to break the function, could
you check it? Thx.
Thanks
Qian
From: Ding, HengX
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:28 AM
To: yongwang at vmware.com
Cc: Xu, Qian Q
In fact, Masaru is the author, and I'm not sure how to detect a VWMARE E1000
device, anyone from vmware can check this? Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 6:08 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Masaru OKI
Cc: dev
We have tested with intel nic and found port can't be started for all
nics:ixgbe/i40e/igb/bonding, see attached mail for more details. Please check
and fix it.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, March
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target:
Suggest to add document for why to have it, the basic usage and the sample of
how to use it.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:32 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v3]
What's your current firmware info, can u run ethtool -i port_interface to
check?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Mishra
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 6:33 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; users at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK
If test the feature by testpmd, how to set the parameter? Need testpmd document
update also?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:24 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] PATCH 1/2] i40e:
Any dependencies with kernel versions? What kernel versions should it support?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:33 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] kdp: add virtual
I have a quick check, VEB/VEPA/VSI is not i40e's specific, they are IEEE EVB
terms. See below.
IEEE EVB tutorial:
http://www.ieee802.org/802_tutorials/2009-11/evb-tutorial-draft-20091116_v09.pdf
Virtual Ethernet Bridge (VEB) - This is an IEEE EVB term. A VEB is a VLAN
Bridge internal to
Virtio1-->Virtio2-->Vhost-->NIC->ixia port. Check the
packet back at ixia port is content correct, no size change and payload change.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:36 PM
To: dev at dp
Does dpdk vhost-switch sample support virtio1.0? I tried it but seems not
working.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 7:19 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
Some virtio-pmd optimization performance data sharing:
1. Use simplified vhost-sample, only doing the dequeuer and free, so virtio
only tx, then test the virtio tx performance improvement. Then in the VM, using
one virtio to do the txonly, and let the virtio tx working. Also modified the
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 6b6a94ee17d246a0078cc83257f522d0a6db5409
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.8
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target:
m is correct.
Result: All the behavior is expected and cksum is correct. So the case is PASS.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 6:45 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Michael S. Tsi
+ legacy virtio". So I'm afraid no customer would like to try
this case since the fake TSO and poor performance.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Liu, Jijiang; dev at
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: c4d404d7c1257465176deb5bb8c84e627d2d5eee
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.8
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target:
Sorry, correct the kernel info, my kernel version is 4.1.8-100.fc21.x86_64.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:45 AM
To: Thomas Monjalon; Marcel Apfelbaum
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Michael S
DPDK GCC 64bit build on kernel 3.18 will be failed, could you help check?
== Build lib/librte_pipeline
/home/qxu10/virtio-opt-test/dpdk/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c:81:106: error:
'VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1' undeclared here (not in a function)
static uint64_t VHOST_FEATURES = VHOST_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
What's your NIC?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:29 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] I have a problem in setting up DPDK 2.1.0 in Fedora OS
release 20 (Heisenbug). I cannot r
Dear
Thomas
Thanks for the comments. See my comments inline below. Let me know if you have
objections, if no, I will send a v4 patch soon.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc
Tested-by: Qian Xu
Commit: c36a82f045ae362b76af4f2a53af10a2a4d2d20f
Test platform: HSW server
OS: Fedora 20
Kernel : 3.18
1. Bind 2ports to igb_uio
2. Run vmdq sample : ./examples/vmdq/build/vmdq_app -n 4 -c 0x1e -- -p 0x3
--nb-pools 63
3. Send 63 flows with different MAC/VLAN and see the output.
Thomas/John
Thanks a lot for your comments, and I will update the patch soon.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:01 PM
To: Mcnamara, John
Cc: Xu, Qian Q; dev at dpdk.org; Jayakumar, Muthurajan
Thomas
Could you help check my doc patch, and let me know anything needed for the
merge? I think it would be very helpful for the users to get high performance
with step-by-step guide. Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:20 AM
Thomas
Could you review the v2 performance doc and apply if no issues? Thanks.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:20 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Xu, Qian Q
Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how to get
DPDK
And this patch will be only related to exact match, the common usage of lpm is
not impacted.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:29 AM
To: Qiu, Michael; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re:
Hi, Thomas and all
I saw in the latest rc1 package, the patch is not merged, and it's a critical
issue from validation view. I'm responsible for testing the dpdk vhost/virtio
features, and I found using the latest code, dpdk-vhost/dpdk-virtio can't RX/TX
package, then my 50% tests are failed
Bernard
Apply the patchset and run vhost-sample, both vhost-user and vhost-cuse, no
impact. Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:51 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
, no packet drops.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Wu, Jingjing
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:22 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Wu, Jingjing; Xu, Qian Q; Zhang, Helin
Subject: [PATCH] i40e: fix the VF rss issue when nb_rx_queue is less than
nb_tx_queue
From: "jingjing.wu"
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: b283164694b6ed18be1856b949e91a80371e44d4
- OS: Fedora 21
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: c55e94f560ef5c9fcee4584952de1d0bd414aece
- OS: Fedora 21
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel
Tested-by: Qian Xu
Signed-off-by: Qian Xu
-Tested commit: 1a1109404e702d3ad1ccc1033df55c59bec1f89a
-Host OS/Kernel: FC21/3.19
-Guest OS/Kernel: FC21/3.19
-NIC: Intel 82599 10G
-Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
-Total 2 cases, 2 passed.
Test Case 1:
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Tested Commit: b67578ccdf45df9fd0f0204578b71acd854ca834
- OS: Fedora20 3.11
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140624
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
- NIC: Intel 82599 Ethernet 10G SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
- Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
-
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Tested Commit: b67578ccdf45df9fd0f0204578b71acd854ca834
- OS: Fedora20 3.11
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140624
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
- NIC: Intel 82599 Ethernet 10G SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
- Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
-
, Helin
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:41 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; Xu, Qian Q; Cao, Waterman; Lu, Patrick; Liu,
Jijiang; Wu, Jingjing; Zhang, Helin
Subject: [PATCH v2] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance
On XL710, performance number is far from the expectation
. Is the crash caused by changing
code or any other step?
What do you want for the vhost-user, changing the notification mechanism?
Thx. By the way, sth means something.
-Original Message-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 12:27 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Xie, Huawei
Cc: lilijun; liuyongan at huawei.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: notify guest to fill buffer when there
is no buffer
On 2015/2/4 9:38, Xu, Qian
issues.
-Original Message-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:19 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Xie, Huawei
Cc: lilijun; liuyongan at huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: notify guest to fill buffer when there
is no buffer
Yes,the lasted
Haifeng
Could you give more information so that we can reproduce your issue? Thanks.
1. What's your dpdk package, based on which branch, with Huawei's vhost-user's
patches?
2. What's your step and command to launch vhost sample?
3. What is mz? Your internal tool? I can't yum install mz or
69 matches
Mail list logo
