Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2020-02-17 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
14/02/2020 16:08, David Marchand: On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:46 AM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Hi, Could I confirm that this patch is going to be merged in 20.02? Sorry, but I can't take this patch in 20.02. It breaks compilation on FreeBSD. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2020-02-13 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi, Could I confirm that this patch is going to be merged in 20.02? Regards, Yasufumi On 2019/12/06 19:44, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 27-Nov-19 8:48 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] build: add dockerfile for building docker image

2019-12-09 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi Abdul, On 2019/12/06 20:12, Halim, Abdul wrote: -Original Message- From: Yasufumi Ogawa Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 7:52 PM To: Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) ; Halim, Abdul ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Kinsella, Ray ; nd Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] build: add dockerfile for

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] build: add dockerfile for building docker image

2019-12-09 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/12/09 12:23, Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: -Original Message- From: Halim, Abdul Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 19:13 To: Yasufumi Ogawa ; Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Kinsella, Ray ; nd ; Richardson, Bruce Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-12-06 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/12/06 19:44, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 27-Nov-19 8:48 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it does not work if several secondaries run

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-12-05 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi Anatoly, On 2019/12/02 19:43, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 29-Nov-19 5:44 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Hi Anatoly, On 2019/11/27 19:26, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 26-Nov-19 7:40 PM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Hi David, Sorry for slow reply. On 2019/11/14 21:27, David Marchand wrote: On Thu, Nov

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] build: add dockerfile for building docker image

2019-12-05 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/12/05 23:13, Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) wrote: -Original Message- From: dev On Behalf Of Abdul Halim Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 19:42 To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: ray.kinse...@intel.com; yasufu...@gmail.com; Abdul Halim Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] build: add dockerfil

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-28 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi Anatoly, On 2019/11/27 19:26, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 26-Nov-19 7:40 PM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Hi David, Sorry for slow reply. On 2019/11/14 21:27, David Marchand wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:42 PM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: On 2019/11/14 2:01, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 13-Nov-19

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-27 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN to the maximum size for secondary * fix warning of Signed-off-by --- Yasufumi Ogawa (1): fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_fbarray.h | 7 ++- lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c | 11 --- 2 files changed, 14

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-27 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it does not work if several secondaries run as app containers because each of containerized secondary has PID 1, and failed to reserve

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-26 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi David, Sorry for slow reply. On 2019/11/14 21:27, David Marchand wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:42 PM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: On 2019/11/14 2:01, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 13-Nov-19 9:43 PM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-14 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/11/14 2:01, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 13-Nov-19 9:43 PM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it does not work if several secondaries

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] build: add dockerfile for building docker image

2019-11-13 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
age + +To build a docker image run the following command from dpdk root directory. + +``` +DOCKER_TAG="dpdk" +docker build -t ${DOCKER_TAG} -f extras/Dockerfile.bionic . +``` Acked-by: Ray Kinsella Tested-by: Yasufumi Ogawa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-11-07 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
-Original Message- From: Burakov, Anatoly Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 11:31 AM To: David Marchand ; Yasufumi Ogawa Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin ; dev ; dpdk stable ; Yasufumi Ogawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary On 05-Nov-19 10:13 AM

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-10-31 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
-Original Message- From: Yasufumi Ogawa Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:42 PM To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Burakov, Anatoly ; david.march...@redhat.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; Yasufumi Ogawa Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary

2019-10-30 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/10/29 21:03, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: -Original Message- From: dev On Behalf Of yasufu...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:08 AM To: Burakov, Anatoly ; david.march...@redhat.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; yasufu...@gmail.com; Yasufumi Ogawa Subject

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-10-26 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/10/27 1:15, David Marchand wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:55 PM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: The title does not reflect the observed issue. I would like to consider to revise it. I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker container. I've conf

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-10-25 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
ed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 AM wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it does not work if secondary is run as app container because each of containerized secondary has

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/null: fix multi-process rx and tx

2019-10-03 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/10/02 1:00, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 9/29/2019 3:41 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Packet processing in secondary process cannot work because rx_pkt_burst and tx_pkt_burst in eth_dev are not initialized while probing device. This patch is to the initialization. Signed-off-by: Yasufumi Ogawa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/null: fix multi-process rx and tx

2019-09-28 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Packet processing in secondary process cannot work because rx_pkt_burst and tx_pkt_burst in eth_dev are not initialized while probing device. This patch is to the initialization. Signed-off-by: Yasufumi Ogawa --- drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-07-30 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/07/30 18:18, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 30-Jul-19 9:16 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 24/07/2019 11:59, Burakov, Anatoly: On 24-Jul-19 9:20 AM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-07-11 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/07/11 22:14, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 11-Jul-19 12:57 PM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: On 2019/07/11 19:53, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 11-Jul-19 11:31 AM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa <...> +    if (getpid() == 1) { +    FILE *hn_fp; +    hn_fp = fopen

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-07-11 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/07/11 19:53, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 11-Jul-19 11:31 AM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa <...> +    if (getpid() == 1) { +    FILE *hn_fp; +    hn_fp = fopen("/etc/hostname", "r"); +    if (hn_fp == NULL) { +  

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-07-11 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
On 2019/07/09 19:26, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 09-Jul-19 11:24 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 09-Jul-19 11:22 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: Hi Anatoly, On 2019/07/05 17:53, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 16-Apr-19 4:43 AM, ogawa.yasuf...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary

2019-07-09 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
Hi Anatoly, On 2019/07/05 17:53, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: On 16-Apr-19 4:43 AM, ogawa.yasuf...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote: From: Yasufumi Ogawa In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it does not work

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/szedata2: do not affect Ethernet interfaces

2018-04-15 Thread Yasufumi Ogawa
the same problem for 998 chars limitation of SMTP. I fixed it by replacing objects with simpler ones. You can check this error by using '--validate' option of git send-email. Thanks, Yasufumi Thanks, Matej -- Yasufumi Ogawa NTT Network Service Systems Labs