> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 09.14
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:57 AM Yang, Qiming wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Tyler
> > May I know why you need to change the legacy atomics? rte_atomic32_xxx
> series action is performance optimized, I don't th
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:57 AM Yang, Qiming wrote:
>
> Hi, Tyler
> May I know why you need to change the legacy atomics? rte_atomic32_xxx series
> action is performance optimized, I don't think the change is needed as no bug
> or other requirement.
The deprecation of rte_atomic32_xxx atomics i
3 5:51 PM
> To: Tyler Retzlaff ; Yang, Qiming
> ; Wu, Wenjun1
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Morten Brørup
> Subject: Re: [Bug 1249] [dpdk-23.07] ixgbe port stop failed after launch
> testpmd
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:32 PM Tyler Retzlaff
> wrote:
> > If
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:32 PM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
> If there has been a broad regression here could I ask for your help in
> either reverting it until I can look at it properly or if you see the
> obvious problem fixing it.
>
> There were multiple instances of flags being converted to
Hi David,
I'm out of office until Thursday so I am not able to properly look right
now.
If there has been a broad regression here could I ask for your help in
either reverting it until I can look at it properly or if you see the
obvious problem fixing it.
There were multiple instances of flags b
Hello Tyler,
(I could not assign this bz to you, please register to bugs.dpdk.org)
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 9:29 AM wrote:
>
> Bug ID 1249
> Summary [dpdk-23.07] ixgbe port stop failed after launch testpmd
> Product DPDK
> Version 23.07
> Hardware All
> OS All
> Status UNCONFIRMED
> Severity norm
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1249
Bug ID: 1249
Summary: [dpdk-23.07] ixgbe port stop failed after launch
testpmd
Product: DPDK
Version: 23.07
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
7 matches
Mail list logo
