[Public]
+ sunil
-Original Message-
From: Akhil Goyal
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 9:31 PM
To: Namburu, Chandu-babu ; 835703...@qq.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; David Marchand
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] crypto/ccp: Check for the NULL pointer after
calling rte_malloc
Hi,
Could you
Hi,
Could you please reply to David and Stephen's comments?
Regards,
Akhil
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:29 AM Namburu, Chandu-babu
> wrote:
> > From: Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
> >
> > As the possible failure of the rte_malloc(), the not_checked and checked
> > could
> be NULL pointer.
> > Ther
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 06:29:06 +
"Namburu, Chandu-babu" wrote:
> sha_ctx = (void *)rte_malloc(NULL, SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE, 64);
> + if (sha_ctx == NULL) {
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
There is unnecessary cast here (pre-existing).
rte_malloc() already returns void *
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:29 AM Namburu, Chandu-babu wrote:
> From: Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
>
> As the possible failure of the rte_malloc(), the not_checked and checked
> could be NULL pointer.
> Therefore, it should be better to check it in order to avoid the dereference
> of the NULL poin
[Public]
Acked-by: Chandubabu Namburu
-Original Message-
From: 835703...@qq.com <835703...@qq.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2022 4:31 PM
To: Namburu, Chandu-babu
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
Subject: [PATCH] crypto/ccp: Check for the NULL pointer a
From: Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
As the possible failure of the rte_malloc(), the not_checked and
checked could be NULL pointer.
Therefore, it should be better to check it in order to avoid
the dereference of the NULL pointer.
Fixes: 09a0fd736a0 ("crypto/ccp: enable IOMMU")
Signed-off-by: Shiqi
6 matches
Mail list logo
