Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-07-15 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/06/2022 11:41, David Marchand: > rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. > Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. > Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark > associated API as internal. > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand Ac

Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-07-04 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 7/5/22 07:43, Hemant Agrawal wrote: Acked-by:  Hemant Agrawal On 7/4/2022 7:59 PM, Kevin Laatz wrote: On 30/06/2022 10:41, David Marchand wrote: rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. Announce that rte_bus will b

Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-07-04 Thread Hemant Agrawal
Acked-by:  Hemant Agrawal On 7/4/2022 7:59 PM, Kevin Laatz wrote: On 30/06/2022 10:41, David Marchand wrote: rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark

Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-07-04 Thread Kevin Laatz
On 30/06/2022 10:41, David Marchand wrote: rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark associated API as internal. Signed-off-by: David Marchand --- A RF

Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-06-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/06/2022 11:54, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:41:53AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. > > Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. > > Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark

Re: [PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-06-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:41:53AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. > Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. > Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark > associated API as internal. > > Signed-o

[PATCH] doc: announce marking bus object as internal

2022-06-30 Thread David Marchand
rte_bus is unnecessarily exposed in the public API/ABI. Besides, we had cases where extending rte_bus was necessary. Announce that rte_bus will be made opaque in the public API and mark associated API as internal. Signed-off-by: David Marchand --- A RFC series of the intended changes is available