On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Martin Weiser wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> thank you very much for your feedback.
> Please see my answers inline below.
>
> I will send a v2 of the patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
> Am 29.10.24 um 18:42 schrieb Bruce Richardson:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 202
Hi Bruce,
thank you very much for your feedback.
Please see my answers inline below.
I will send a v2 of the patch.
Best regards,
Martin
Am 29.10.24 um 18:42 schrieb Bruce Richardson:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:17:07PM +0100, Martin Weiser wrote:
>>
>> The issue only appeared with hardware-t
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:17:07PM +0100, Martin Weiser wrote:
>
> The issue only appeared with hardware-timestamping enabled
> (RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP).
>
> The length of the prepended hardware timestamp was not subtracted from
> the data length so that received packets were 16 bytes longe
The issue only appeared with hardware-timestamping enabled
(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP).
The length of the prepended hardware timestamp was not subtracted from
the data length so that received packets were 16 bytes longer than
expected.
In scatter-gather mode only the first mbuf has a timesta
The issue only appeared with hardware-timestamping enabled
(RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP).
The length of the prepended hardware timestamp was not subtracted from
the data length so that received packets were 16 bytes longer than
expected.
In scatter-gather mode only the first mbuf has a timestam
5 matches
Mail list logo
