On 6/19/2024 7:48 AM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>> From: Sriram Yagnaraman [mailto:sriram.yagnara...@ericsson.com]
>>
>> Hi Morten,
>>
>>> From: Morten Brørup
>>>
From: Sriram Yagnaraman [mailto:sriram.yagnara...@ericsson.com]
When using ring based ethdev, mbuf->port is not set on receiv
On 6/18/2024 8:14 PM, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Morten Brørup
>> Sent: Tuesday, 18 June 2024 18:01
>> To: Sriram Yagnaraman
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ring: Set
> From: Sriram Yagnaraman [mailto:sriram.yagnara...@ericsson.com]
>
> Hi Morten,
>
> > From: Morten Brørup
> >
> > > From: Sriram Yagnaraman [mailto:sriram.yagnara...@ericsson.com]
> > >
> > > When using ring based ethdev, mbuf->port is not set on received packets.
> > >
> > > For applications t
Hi Morten,
> -Original Message-
> From: Morten Brørup
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 June 2024 18:01
> To: Sriram Yagnaraman
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ring: Set mbuf->port for received packets
>
> [Du får inte e-post ofta från m...
> From: Sriram Yagnaraman [mailto:sriram.yagnara...@ericsson.com]
>
> When using ring based ethdev, mbuf->port is not set on received packets.
>
> For applications that use the mbuf->port to identify the incoming port,
> especially when eventdev RX adapter pulls the packet on a different core
> a
When using ring based ethdev, mbuf->port is not set on received packets.
For applications that use the mbuf->port to identify the incoming port,
especially when eventdev RX adapter pulls the packet on a different core
and the application running on a worker core has no clue on the incoming
port. T
6 matches
Mail list logo