Re: [PATCH 0/5] use rte atomic thread fence

2024-02-14 Thread Thomas Monjalon
08/11/2023 19:49, Tyler Retzlaff: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 02/11/2023 04:04, Tyler Retzlaff: > > > Replace use of __atomic_thread_fence with __rte_atomic_thread_fence. > > > > > > It may be appropriate to use rte_atomic_thread_fence instead but it > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] use rte atomic thread fence

2023-11-08 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 02/11/2023 04:04, Tyler Retzlaff: > > Replace use of __atomic_thread_fence with __rte_atomic_thread_fence. > > > > It may be appropriate to use rte_atomic_thread_fence instead but it > > will be up to maintainers to evaluate and ma

Re: [PATCH 0/5] use rte atomic thread fence

2023-11-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
02/11/2023 04:04, Tyler Retzlaff: > Replace use of __atomic_thread_fence with __rte_atomic_thread_fence. > > It may be appropriate to use rte_atomic_thread_fence instead but it > will be up to maintainers to evaluate and make the change if appropriate. I don't understand the use of __rte_atomic_t

RE: [PATCH 0/5] use rte atomic thread fence

2023-11-02 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2023 04.04 > > Replace use of __atomic_thread_fence with __rte_atomic_thread_fence. > > It may be appropriate to use rte_atomic_thread_fence instead but it > will be up to maintainers to evaluate and make th

[PATCH 0/5] use rte atomic thread fence

2023-11-01 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
Replace use of __atomic_thread_fence with __rte_atomic_thread_fence. It may be appropriate to use rte_atomic_thread_fence instead but it will be up to maintainers to evaluate and make the change if appropriate. Tyler Retzlaff (5): distributor: use rte atomic thread fence eal: use rte atomic t