Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On 5/12/22 15:56, Stanisław Kardach wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:46 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: The above failures for performance tests without a bound NIC can be reproduced on x86_64. So this is not RISC-V specific. With both ports of an Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gi

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:46 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > The above failures for performance tests without a bound NIC can be > reproduced on x86_64. So this is not RISC-V specific. > > With both ports of an Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit > X540-AT2 bound to the sfio-pci dri

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On 5/12/22 10:35, Stanisław Kardach wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:04 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 5/5/22 19:29, Stanislaw Kardach wrote: This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and was t

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:04 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 5/5/22 19:29, Stanislaw Kardach wrote: > > This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V > > architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and > > was tested on SiFive Unmatched develo

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On 5/5/22 19:29, Stanislaw Kardach wrote: This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and was tested on SiFive Unmatched development board with the Freedom U740 SoC running Linux (freedom-u-sdk based ke

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

11/05/2022 12:28, Stanisław Kardach: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:09 AM Morten Brørup > wrote: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > > 09/05/2022 14:24, Stanisław Kardach: > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Marchand wrote: > > > > > About the new "Sponsored-by" t

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:09 AM Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, 9 May 2022 14.31 > > > > 09/05/2022 14:24, Stanisław Kardach: > > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Marchand > > > > > wrote: > > > > About the new "Sponsored-by

RE: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Monday, 9 May 2022 14.31 > > 09/05/2022 14:24, Stanisław Kardach: > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Marchand > > > wrote: > > > About the new "Sponsored-by" tag, it should not raise warnings in > the > > > CI if we agree on its

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

10/05/2022 16:00, Stanisław Kardach: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:32 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 10/05/2022 13:21, Stanisław Kardach: > > > > > > Using "Sponsored by:" does not trigger checks above (still feels like a > > > hack). > > > > Agree it is a hack, > > and not having the hyphen break

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:32 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 10/05/2022 13:21, Stanisław Kardach: > > > > Using "Sponsored by:" does not trigger checks above (still feels like a > > hack). > > Agree it is a hack, > and not having the hyphen breaks my Vim colouring :) > > We can ignore this checkpatch

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

10/05/2022 13:21, Stanisław Kardach: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:31 PM David Marchand > wrote: > > >> About the new "Sponsored-by" tag, it should not raise warnings in the > > >> CI if we agree on its addition. > > > > > > I'll modify it in V2 to be in form of: > > > Sponsored by: StarFive Techno

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:31 PM David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:24 PM Stanisław Kardach wrote: > >> Testing all riscv configs in test-meson-buils.sh seems too much to me. > >> Is there a real value to test both current targets? > > > > It's for sanity and compilation coverage tes

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:24 PM Stanisław Kardach wrote: >> Testing all riscv configs in test-meson-buils.sh seems too much to me. >> Is there a real value to test both current targets? > > It's for sanity and compilation coverage testing. I.e. SiFive variant has a > specific build config which do

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

09/05/2022 14:24, Stanisław Kardach: > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Marchand > wrote: > > About the new "Sponsored-by" tag, it should not raise warnings in the > > CI if we agree on its addition. > > > I'll modify it in V2 to be in form of: > Sponsored by: StarFive Technology You mean

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:30 PM Stanislaw Kardach wrote: > > > > This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V > > architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and > > was tested on SiFive Unma

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:30 PM Stanislaw Kardach wrote: > > This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V > architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and > was tested on SiFive Unmatched development board with the Freedom U740 > SoC running Linux

[PATCH 00/11] Introduce support for RISC-V architecture

This patchset adds support for building and running DPDK on 64bit RISC-V architecture. The initial support targets rv64gc (rv64imafdc) ISA and was tested on SiFive Unmatched development board with the Freedom U740 SoC running Linux (freedom-u-sdk based kernel). I have tested this codebase using DPD