On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 04:58:59PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 07:30:47PM +0800, Jun Wang wrote:
> > The code to update link status is not safe in secondary process.
> > If called from secondary it will crash, example from dumpcap:
> > eth_em_link_update
> >
> > Si
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 07:30:47PM +0800, Jun Wang wrote:
> The code to update link status is not safe in secondary process.
> If called from secondary it will crash, example from dumpcap:
> eth_em_link_update
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Wang
> ---
> drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 3 +++
> 1 fil
I used the e1000 NIC with OVS-DPDK and experienced a failure when using the
/dpdk/app/dpdk-dumpcap command to capture packets. After making modifications,
it worked fine.
/dpdk/app/dpdk-dumpcap -i :00:04.0
File: /tmp/dpdk-dumpcap_0_:00:04.0_20240723020203.pcapng
Segmentation fault (core
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 04:26:26PM +0800, Jun Wang wrote:
>>> The code to update link status is not safe in secondary process.
>>> If called from secondary it will crash, example from dumpcap:
>>> eth_em_link_update
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Wang
>>
>> Wouldn't it
>> The code to update link status is not safe in secondary process.
>> If called from secondary it will crash, example from dumpcap:
>> eth_em_link_update
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun Wang
>
> Wouldn't it be better to fix the code in e1000_check_link to work in
> secondary process. There are netw
The code to update link status is not safe in secondary process.
If called from secondary it will crash, example from dumpcap:
eth_em_link_update
Signed-off-by: Jun Wang
---
drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c b/d
6 matches
Mail list logo
