Hi Huichao,
I've been busy lately, sorry to reply to you late.
No worries at all.
Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
parameter for that function.
In a same way we have it for rte_
Hi Konstantin,
I've been busy lately, sorry to reply to you late.
> Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
> from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
> parameter for that function.
> In a same way we have it for rte_ipv4_fragment_
11/07/2022 00:35, Konstantin Ananyev пишет:
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> offload. In order to adapt to this o
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> Add some test da
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
Add some test data for this
5 matches
Mail list logo