On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 1/31/2023 11:13 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
On 1/31/23 14:08, Ivan Malov wrote:
Currently, the "pick transfer proxy ethdev" callback is only
advertised for non-representor (in example, main PF) ethdevs.
That does not sit well with the original idea of
On 1/31/2023 11:13 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 1/31/23 14:08, Ivan Malov wrote:
>> Currently, the "pick transfer proxy ethdev" callback is only
>> advertised for non-representor (in example, main PF) ethdevs.
>> That does not sit well with the original idea of this method,
>> which is to let a
On 1/31/23 14:08, Ivan Malov wrote:
Currently, the "pick transfer proxy ethdev" callback is only
advertised for non-representor (in example, main PF) ethdevs.
That does not sit well with the original idea of this method,
which is to let applications discover the privileged port to
use for transfe
Currently, the "pick transfer proxy ethdev" callback is only
advertised for non-representor (in example, main PF) ethdevs.
That does not sit well with the original idea of this method,
which is to let applications discover the privileged port to
use for transfer flow management instead of any given
4 matches
Mail list logo
