On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 2:05 PM Volodymyr Fialko wrote:
>
> It's possible to initialize reorder buffer with user allocated memory via
> rte_reorder_init() function. In such case rte_reorder_create() is not
> required and reorder dynamic field in rte_mbuf will not be registered.
>
> Both reorder li
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:47 PM Pattan, Reshma wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Marchand
> > > A gentle reminder, please review and ack/comment.
> > > Can we have this merged before RC3?
> >
> > I did not go into depth this time, the fix seems ok.
> > Reshma, please review.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
> > A gentle reminder, please review and ack/comment.
> > Can we have this merged before RC3?
>
> I did not go into depth this time, the fix seems ok.
> Reshma, please review.
>
>
Hi David,
Unfortunately do not have a bandwidth to review th
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:29 PM Volodymyr Fialko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A gentle reminder, please review and ack/comment.
> Can we have this merged before RC3?
I did not go into depth this time, the fix seems ok.
Reshma, please review.
--
David Marchand
lanukkaran ; Anoob Joseph
> ; Volodymyr
> Fialko ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] reorder: fix registration of dynamic field in mbuf
>
> It's possible to initialize reorder buffer with user allocated memory via
> rte_reorder_init() function. In such case rte_reorde
It's possible to initialize reorder buffer with user allocated memory via
rte_reorder_init() function. In such case rte_reorder_create() is not
required and reorder dynamic field in rte_mbuf will not be registered.
Both reorder lib and mbuf dynamic field are using `rte_mcfg_tailq`
read/write lock
It's possible to initialize reorder buffer with user allocated memory via
rte_reorder_init() function. In such case rte_reorder_create() is not
required and reorder dynamic field in rte_mbuf will not be registered.
Both reorder lib and mbuf dynamic field are using `rte_mcfg_tailq`
read/write lock
7 matches
Mail list logo
