On 10/17/2024 8:20 PM, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Alan Elder
>
> The previous code allowed the number of Tx queues to be set higher than
> the number of Rx queues. If a packet was sent on a Tx queue with index
>> = number Rx queues there was a segfault due to accessing beyond the en
On 10/18/2024 12:02 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:38:49 +
> Long Li wrote:
>
>>> Subject: Re: [Patch v5] net/netvsc: fix number Tx queues > Rx queues
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:20:29 -0700
>>> lon...@l
Recheck-request: intel-Functional, intel-Testing
> Subject: Re: [Patch v5] net/netvsc: fix number Tx queues > Rx queues
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:20:29 -0700
> lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
>
> > +static void
> > +hn_rx_queue_free_common(struct hn_rx_queue *rxq) {
> > + if (!rxq)
> > +
From: Alan Elder
The previous code allowed the number of Tx queues to be set higher than
the number of Rx queues. If a packet was sent on a Tx queue with index
>= number Rx queues there was a segfault due to accessing beyond the end
of the dev->data->rx_queues[] array.
This commit fixes the iss
5 matches
Mail list logo
