On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 11:37 +0100, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>
> > +{
> > + struct rte_event_dev_info dev_info;
> > +
> > + rte_event_dev_info_get(dev_id, &dev_info);
> > + return (dev_info.event_dev_cap &
> > RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_MAINTENANCE_FREE) ?
> > + true :
Thank you for the feedback. I will re-implement the test by not checking
port-flow-queue combination and generally clean-up the code based on your
comments.
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 11:37 +0100, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>
> > +{
> > + struct rte_event_dev_info dev_info;
> > +
> > + rte_
On 2024-12-05 14:29, Luka Jankovic wrote:
From 753273ab9af49e16d7f7b577d6263e3db51257d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luka Jankovic
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 13:05:35 +
Subject: [RFC] eventdev: add atomic queue to test-eventdev app
Add an atomic queue test based on the order queue test but
From 753273ab9af49e16d7f7b577d6263e3db51257d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luka Jankovic
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 13:05:35 +
Subject: [RFC] eventdev: add atomic queue to test-eventdev app
Add an atomic queue test based on the order queue test but use exclusively
atomic queues.
This makes it
4 matches
Mail list logo
