Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:46 AM
> > To: Sexton, Rory ;
> > konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; nd
> > Subject: RE: [RFC 0/1] ring: add callback infrastructire to ring
> > library
> >
> > Hi Roxy,
Sincere apologies for spelling your nam
antin.v.anan...@yandex.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; nd
> Subject: RE: [RFC 0/1] ring: add callback infrastructire to ring library
>
> Hi Roxy,
> Thanks for the work, few questions inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rory Sexton
> > Sent: T
Hi Roxy,
Thanks for the work, few questions inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory Sexton
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 6:38 AM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli ;
> konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Rory Sexton
> Subject: [RFC 0/
> From: Rory Sexton [mailto:rory.sex...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2023 12.38
>
> This is an RFC proposing the addition of a callback infrastructure to the ring
> library, particularly in the ring dequeue functions, but they could also be
> added to the enqueue functions if desired.
>
This is an RFC proposing the addition of a callback infrastructure to the ring
library, particularly in the ring dequeue functions, but they could also be
added to the enqueue functions if desired.
Callbacks in the ring dequeue functions would be beneficial for a number of
reasons including but no
5 matches
Mail list logo
