10/05/2019 16:55, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:53:12AM -0400, Michael Santana wrote:
> > snprintf guarantees to always correctly place a null terminator in the
> > buffer
> > string. So manually placing a null terminator in a buffer right after a call
> > to snprintf is redundant
On 5/10/19 11:28 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 10-May-19 3:53 PM, Michael Santana wrote:
snprintf guarantees to always correctly place a null terminator in
the buffer
string. So manually placing a null terminator in a buffer right after
a call
to snprintf is redundant code.
Additionally, the
On 10-May-19 3:53 PM, Michael Santana wrote:
snprintf guarantees to always correctly place a null terminator in the buffer
string. So manually placing a null terminator in a buffer right after a call
to snprintf is redundant code.
Additionally, there is no need to use 'sizeof(buffer) - 1' in snp
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:53:12AM -0400, Michael Santana wrote:
> snprintf guarantees to always correctly place a null terminator in the buffer
> string. So manually placing a null terminator in a buffer right after a call
> to snprintf is redundant code.
>
> Additionally, there is no need to use
snprintf guarantees to always correctly place a null terminator in the buffer
string. So manually placing a null terminator in a buffer right after a call
to snprintf is redundant code.
Additionally, there is no need to use 'sizeof(buffer) - 1' in snprintf as this
means we are not using the last c
5 matches
Mail list logo
