Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload

2021-09-07 Thread Xu, Rosen
v, Konstantin ; > tho...@monjalon.net; adwiv...@marvell.com; Yigit, Ferruh > ; andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload > > Hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Akhil Goyal > > Sent:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload

2021-09-07 Thread Xu, Rosen
o...@monjalon.net; adwiv...@marvell.com; Yigit, Ferruh > ; andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru; Akhil Goyal > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload > > Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in software, however, if it is > offloaded to HW, it can considerabl

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload

2021-09-07 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/23/2021 11:02 AM, Akhil Goyal wrote: > Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in > software, however, if it is offloaded to HW, it can > considerably save application cycles. > The operation becomes even more costlier if IP fragmants > are encrypted. > > To resolve above two issues, a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload

2021-08-23 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 8/23/21 1:02 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote: > Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in > software, however, if it is offloaded to HW, it can > considerably save application cycles. > The operation becomes even more costlier if IP fragmants > are encrypted. > > To resolve above two issues, a ne

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload

2021-08-23 Thread Akhil Goyal
Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in software, however, if it is offloaded to HW, it can considerably save application cycles. The operation becomes even more costlier if IP fragmants are encrypted. To resolve above two issues, a new offload DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY is introduced in