[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test

2014-07-01 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Pablo, On 07/01/2014 10:59 AM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > I checked your patch, and I got this: > > ... > > EAL: Detected lcore 38 as core 11 on socket 1 > EAL: Detected lcore 39 as core 12 on socket 1 > EAL: Support maximum 64 logical core(s) by configuration. > EAL: Detected 40 lcore(s) >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test

2014-07-01 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Pablo, On 06/30/2014 04:42 PM, Pablo de Lara wrote: > From: Pablo de Lara > > In whitelist test, within EAL flags unit test, vdev flag > was being tested, but test fails, as a secondary process > cannot allocate memzones, so it cannot create the device > and application exits. Also, this can b

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test

2014-07-01 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Hi Olivier, > -Original Message- > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 9:31 AM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Olivier MATZ > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags &

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test

2014-06-30 Thread Pablo de Lara
From: Pablo de Lara In whitelist test, within EAL flags unit test, vdev flag was being tested, but test fails, as a secondary process cannot allocate memzones, so it cannot create the device and application exits. Also, this can be tested in ring pmd test, which needs vdev and not in whitelist, w