pushed
thank you all
--
Thomas
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 06:00:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> From: Dongsu Han
>
> test-pmd txonly leaks mbuf from the pool.
> The function tx_mbuf_alloc() does not change the refcnt
> and the refcnt is 0 when it is first allocated.
> However, rte_pktmbuf_free_seg called by the driver's xmit
From: Dongsu Han
test-pmd txonly leaks mbuf from the pool.
The function tx_mbuf_alloc() does not change the refcnt
and the refcnt is 0 when it is first allocated.
However, rte_pktmbuf_free_seg called by the driver's xmit code decrements
reference count to -1. So mbuf never goes back to the pool.
Hi all (replying below)
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:28:33AM -0400, Han, Dongsu wrote:
> Sounds good. With the two bug fixes I submitted txonly now runs perfectly.
> Thanks!
> -Dongsu
> On May 6, 2013 8:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon"
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dongsu Han,
> >
> > I think your fix is right.
> >
Hi Dongsu Han,
I think your fix is right.
I've just removed tx_mbuf_alloc() and directly called rte_pktmbuf_alloc()
instead.
Is it OK for you ?
Could you also review this (modified) description ?
Thank you
---
From: Dongsu Han
test-pmd txonly leaks mbuf from the pool.
The function tx_mbuf_al
In addition to this, we should probably clone pkt mbuf using
rte_pktmbuf_clone()
and transmit the cloned packet. This will avoid having to copy the mac and
IP headers.
-Dongsu
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Hi all (replying below)
>
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:28:33A
Sounds good. With the two bug fixes I submitted txonly now runs perfectly.
Thanks!
-Dongsu
On May 6, 2013 8:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
> Hi Dongsu Han,
>
> I think your fix is right.
> I've just removed tx_mbuf_alloc() and directly called rte_pktmbuf_alloc()
> instead.
> Is it OK for you ?
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
