On 17 June 2016 at 18:30, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-05-19 17:56, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 2016-05-19 21:48, Jianbo Liu:
>> > On 13 May 2016 at 23:49, Thomas Monjalon
>> > wrote:
>> > > 2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
>> > >> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
>> > >> so change it
2016-05-19 17:56, Thomas Monjalon:
> 2016-05-19 21:48, Jianbo Liu:
> > On 13 May 2016 at 23:49, Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > > 2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
> > >> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
> > >> so change it to an inline function.
> > >
> > > Any example in mind?
> >
On 13 May 2016 at 23:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
>> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
>> so change it to an inline function.
>
> Any example in mind?
>
It's for ODP-DPDK.
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
>> +++
2016-05-19 21:48, Jianbo Liu:
> On 13 May 2016 at 23:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
> >> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
> >> so change it to an inline function.
> >
> > Any example in mind?
> >
> It's for ODP-DPDK.
Given that ODP is open
2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
> so change it to an inline function.
Any example in mind?
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
> -#define rte_memcpy(d, s,
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:01:04PM +0530, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
Instead of "Other APP" may be better to use DPDK application
> so change it to an inline function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob
> ---
>
Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
so change it to an inline function.
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
7 matches
Mail list logo