On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Andriy Berestovskyy
wrote:
> The following messages might appear after some idle time:
> "PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool"
>
> The fix ensures the mempool size is greater than the sum
> of TX descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Andriy Berestovskyy
On 14/12/15 14:07, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-10 22:50, Thomas Monjalon:
>> Please Declan,
>> Could you check these patches from Andriy
>> and tell how safe it is for 2.2?
>
> Declan, you have just acked 2 patches from Andriy without telling
> how safe they are for 2.2.
> Also we hadn't
2015-12-10 22:50, Thomas Monjalon:
> Please Declan,
> Could you check these patches from Andriy
> and tell how safe it is for 2.2?
Declan, you have just acked 2 patches from Andriy without telling
how safe they are for 2.2.
Also we hadn't notice there is no Signed-off-by lines in these patches.
On 08/12/15 13:23, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
> The following messages might appear after some idle time:
> "PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool"
>
> The fix ensures the mempool size is greater than the sum
> of TX descriptors.
Acked-by: Declan Doherty
Please Declan,
Could you check these patches from Andriy
and tell how safe it is for 2.2?
Thanks
2015-12-08 14:23, Andriy Berestovskyy:
> The following messages might appear after some idle time:
> "PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool"
>
> The fix ensures the mempool size is greater
The following messages might appear after some idle time:
"PMD: Failed to allocate LACP packet from pool"
The fix ensures the mempool size is greater than the sum
of TX descriptors.
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9
6 matches
Mail list logo
