Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix rte_hash_hash comment for ambiguity

2019-05-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > rte_hash_hash is multi-thread safe but not multi-process safe because of > > the use of function pointers. Previous document and comment says the other > > way around. This commit fixes the issue. > > Acked-by: John McNamara Applied, thanks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix rte_hash_hash comment for ambiguity

2019-04-30 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yipeng Wang > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 10:40 AM > To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > ; gentoor...@gmail.com; Burakov, Anatoly > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dp

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix rte_hash_hash comment for ambiguity

2019-04-29 Thread Dharmik Thakkar
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 4:40 AM, Yipeng Wang wrote: > > rte_hash_hash is multi-thread safe but not multi-process safe > because of the use of function pointers. Previous document > and comment says the other way around. This commit fixes > the issue. > > Fixes: fc1f2750a3ec ("doc: programmers gu

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix rte_hash_hash comment for ambiguity

2019-04-29 Thread Yipeng Wang
rte_hash_hash is multi-thread safe but not multi-process safe because of the use of function pointers. Previous document and comment says the other way around. This commit fixes the issue. Fixes: fc1f2750a3ec ("doc: programmers guide") Fixes: 48a399119619 ("hash: replace with cuckoo hash implement