On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/2/2021 5:04 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:59 PM Andrew Rybchenko
wrote:
IMHO, spamming of testpmd logs in described case should be fixed
in testpmd itself to avoid logs in the case of ENOTSUP. That's it.
I think we should n
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fine tune error reporting in pick
> transfer proxy API
>
> 15/11/2021 15:15, Ivan Malov:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, Ferruh Yig
15/11/2021 15:15, Ivan Malov:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> > On 11/2/2021 5:04 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:59 PM Andrew Rybchenko
> >> wrote:
> > IMHO, spamming of testpmd logs in described case should be fixed
> > in testpmd itself to avoid l
On 11/2/2021 5:04 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:59 PM Andrew Rybchenko
wrote:
IMHO, spamming of testpmd logs in described case should be fixed
in testpmd itself to avoid logs in the case of ENOTSUP. That's it.
I think we should not call this API in testpmd
if not doing rt
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:59 PM Andrew Rybchenko
wrote:
> >> IMHO, spamming of testpmd logs in described case should be fixed
> >> in testpmd itself to avoid logs in the case of ENOTSUP. That's it.
> >
> > I think we should not call this API in testpmd
> > if not doing rte_flow transfer rule.
> >
>
On 11/2/21 6:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
01/11/2021 10:41, Andrew Rybchenko:
On 10/27/21 12:00 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
Fi
01/11/2021 10:41, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 10/27/21 12:00 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
> > There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
> > In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
> > is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
> >
> > Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethde
On 10/27/21 12:00 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethdev: query proxy port to manage transfer flows")
Signed-o
28/10/2021 18:24, Ivan Malov:
> On 27/10/2021 13:57, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 27/10/2021 11:55, Ivan Malov:
> >> On 27/10/2021 12:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
> -if (unlikely(ops == NULL))
> -return -rte_errno;
> -
> -
Good day to you, Thomas.
On 27/10/2021 13:57, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
27/10/2021 11:55, Ivan Malov:
Hi Thomas,
On 27/10/2021 12:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP
27/10/2021 11:55, Ivan Malov:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 27/10/2021 12:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
> >> There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
> >> In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
> >> is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid
Hi Thomas,
On 27/10/2021 12:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethdev: query
27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
> There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
> In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
> is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
>
> Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethdev: query proxy port to manage transfer flows")
>
> Signed
There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethdev: query proxy port to manage transfer flows")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov
---
lib/ethdev/rte_flo
14 matches
Mail list logo
