[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code

2016-06-07 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-24 19:31, Ferruh Yigit: > On 5/24/2016 1:52 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Burakov > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:50 PM > >> To: dev at dpdk.org > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PAT

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code

2016-05-24 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 5/24/2016 1:52 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Burakov >> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:50 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code >> >> Partia

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code

2016-05-24 Thread Anatoly Burakov
Partial revert of an earlier ill-conceived "fix". Adjacent segments can never be considered overlapping because we are not comparing ends to starts, but rather starts to starts. Therefore the earlier fix was wrong (plus it also had a typo). Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- lib/librte_eal/linux

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code

2016-05-24 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Burakov > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:50 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ivshmem: fix overlap detection code > > Partial revert of an earlier ill-conceived "fix". > Adjacent s