Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to
different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to
get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it.
Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully
support mailbox message IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES. The service rout
Sorry it was not on my mind. Next patch will not have any trace to GPL code. -ql
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> 21/10/2013 13:28, jigsaw :
>> The ixgbevf_negotiate_api is copied from Intel's VF driver.
> [..]
>> I will make another attempt with elimination of ixgbevf_n
21/10/2013 13:28, jigsaw :
> The ixgbevf_negotiate_api is copied from Intel's VF driver.
[..]
> I will make another attempt with elimination of ixgbevf_negotiate_api.
Please, when sending a patch, be sure that there is no licensing issue.
We cannot integrate GPL code in BSD files.
By adding your
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for comment.
The ixgbevf_negotiate_api is copied from Intel's VF driver. The while
loop is not quite usual, indeed. A direct call to
ixgbevf_negotiate_api_version(hw, ixgbe_mbox_api_11) is sufficient, I
think. Coz PF is supposed to be satisfied with ver 1.1.
I will make another a
Hi,
21/10/2013 09:09, Qinglai Xiao :
> Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to
> different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to
> get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it.
>
> Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully
> support mai
Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to
different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to
get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it.
Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully
support mailbox message IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES. The service rout
6 matches
Mail list logo
